Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218367›Full record

Observational studyArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2022

Influence of presence in an inter-professional simulation training of the emergency caesarean section: a cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Markus Flentje, Vera Hagemann, Lars Brodowski, Spiyridon Papageorgiou, Constantin von Kaisenberg, Hendrik Eismann

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus FlentjeDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Vera HagemannFaculty of Business Studies and Economics, Business Psychology, University of Bremen, Enrique-Schmidt-Strasse 1, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Lars BrodowskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Spiyridon PapageorgiouDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Constantin von KaisenbergDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Hendrik EismannDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. eismann.hendrik@mh-hannover.de.ORCID 0000-0003-0962-8091
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Bremen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEmergency training using simulation is a method to increase patient safety in the delivery room. The effect of individual training concepts is critically discussed and requires evaluation. A possible influence factor of success can be the perceived reality of the participants. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the presence in a simulated emergency caesarean section improves subjective effect of the training and evaluation.

methodsIn this observation study, professionals took part in simulated emergency caesarean sections to improve workflow and non-technical skills. Presence was measured by means of a validated questionnaire, effects and evaluation by means of a newly created questionnaire directly after the training. Primary outcome was a correlation between presence and assumed effect of training and evaluation.

results106 participants (70% of course participants) answered the questionnaires. Reliability of the presence scale was good (Cronbach's alpha 0.72). The presence correlated significantly with all evaluated items of non-technical skills and evaluation of the course. The factor "mutual support" showed a high effect size (0.639), the overall evaluation of the course (0.395) and the willingness to participate again (0.350) a medium effect. There were no differences between the professional groups.

conclusionThe presence correlates with the assumed training objectives and evaluation of the course. If training is not successful, it is one factor that needs to be improved.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionSimulation TrainingClinical CompetenceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesInterdisciplinary collaborationSimulationTraining successVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID35218367
PMCPMC9166820
OpenAlexW4214566436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.