ArticleClinical and translational allergy2022
Ligelizumab improves sleep interference and disease burden in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.
Article in Clinical and translational allergy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02477332 (A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo, and Active-controlled Phase 2b Dose-finding Study of QGE031 as add-on Therapy to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Multi-center, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo, and Active-controlled Phase 2b Dose-finding Study of QGE031 as add-on Therapy to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety in Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU)
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy and Safety of Ligelizumab in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Clinical drug investigation · 2025Pooled it
- Exploring the Impact of Fatigue and Sleep Disturbance in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: Perspectives from Patients and Healthcare Professionals.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2026Review
- An Assessment of Melatonin Levels in the Saliva of Patients with Chronic Urticaria in Comparison with Their Sleep Quality and Dermatologic Quality of Life.Clinics and practice · 2026Article
- Dupilumab Improves Health-Related Quality of Life in Omalizumab-Naïve Patients with Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Dermatology and therapy · 2026Article
- Sleep Disturbance Mediates the Association Between Disease Activity and Work Productivity Impairments in Chronic Urticaria.Allergy · 2025Article
- Biological and target synthetic treatments for chronic spontaneous urticaria: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Clinical and translational allergy · 2025Article
- CRUSEClinical and translational allergy · 2024Article
- Why a Complete Response Is the Treatment Aim in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Urticaria.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022Review
- Monoclonal Antibodies in Treating Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: New Drugs for an Old Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Ligelizumab improves sleep interference and disease burden in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria.Clinical and translational allergy · 2022Article
- Diagnosis and Management of Urticaria in Indian Settings: Skin Allergy Research Society's Guideline-2022.Indian journal of dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) negatively impacts patients' sleep, thereby reducing health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Half of patients with inadequately controlled CSU report sleep interference often or every night, which can lead to depression, anxiety, social, and work-related problems.
methodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 2b core study (NCT02477332) included adult patients ≥18 years with moderate to severe CSU inadequately controlled with H
resultsMean baseline SIS7 scores were balanced between the treatment arms for ligelizumab 72 mg (n = 84) and 240 mg (n = 85), omalizumab 300 mg (n = 85), and placebo (n = 43). By Week 12, patients experienced large improvements in sleep interference, with least square mean (standard error) changes from baseline (CFB) in SIS7 of -7.84 (0.58), -7.55 (0.61), -6.98 (0.60), and -5.85 (0.81), respectively. By Week 12, CFB in AIS7 were -8.25 (0.57), -8.25 (0.59), -7.30 (0.60), and -5.62 (0.79), DLQI scores were -9.79 (0.77), -9.93 (0.81), -8.35 (0.79), and -6.99 (1.11), and Overall Work Impairment scores were -28.96 (3.73), -30.76 (3.71), -25.74 (3.91), and -20.13 (5.10) for ligelizumab 72 and 240 mg, omalizumab 300 mg and placebo, respectively. Improvements in each patient-reported outcome were sustained with ligelizumab 240 mg treatment during the extension study.
conclusionsLigelizumab showed effective and sustained responses in managing sleep interference in patients with CSU, and numerically higher responses than with omalizumab and placebo. Treating the symptoms of CSU with ligelizumab improved disease burden, HRQoL, and markedly improved sleep quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.