Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218288›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2022

The Tell me tool: The development and feasibility of a tool for person-centred infertility care.

Eva W Verkerk, Ester A Rake, Didi D M Braat, Willianne L D M Nelen, Johanna W M Aarts, Jan A M Kremer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. The Tell me tool: The development and feasibility of a tool for person-centred infertility care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Eva W VerkerkDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6596-6207
Ester A RakeDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2262-3818
Didi D M BraatDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Willianne L D M NelenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
Johanna W M AartsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Jan A M KremerDepartment of IQ Healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0495-0201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAn important-and often missing-element of person-centred care is the inclusion of individual patients' values and preferences. This is challenging but especially important for high-burden fertility treatments. We describe the development of a clinical tool that aims to facilitate the delivery of person-centred fertility care by giving insight into the patients' values and preferences.

methodsWe developed the Tell me tool following the three principles of user-centred design: (1) early and continual focus on users; (2) iterative design; (3) measurement of user behaviour. Accordingly, our methods consisted of three phases: (1) conducting semi-structured interviews with 18 couples undergoing fertility treatment, followed by a consensus meeting with relevant stakeholders; (2) performing seven iterative improvement rounds; (3) testing the feasibility of the tool in 10 couples.

resultsThe Tell me tool consists of a ranking assignment of 13 themes and two open-ended questions. These themes relate to the couples' wellbeing and experience of the treatment, such as mental health and shared decision making. The open-ended questions ask them to write down what matters most to them. The field test showed variation between the individual patients' answers. The tool proved to highlight what is important to the individual patient and gives insight into patients' personal contexts.

conclusionsWe developed a tool that gives insight into the values and preferences of the individual patient. The tool seems feasible for facilitating person-centred fertility care. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: The tool was developed with a user-centred design that strongly involved patients.

Indexed as

InfertilityPatient-Centered CareFeasibility StudiesHumansResearch Designinfertilitypatient-centred careperson-centred careuser-centred design

Identifiers

PMID35218288
PMCPMC9122469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.