Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218256›Full record

Observational studyJournal of paediatrics and child health2022

The impact of a multidisciplinary care package for vaccination in needle phobic children: An observational study.

Rebecca Doyle, Alex Donaldson, Leanne Philips, Laurelle Nelson, Julia E Clark, Sophie Chien-Hui Wen

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of paediatrics and child health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Reducing distress during vaccine injections: 2026 clinical practice guideline update.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca DoyleChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1481-7076
Alex DonaldsonChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Leanne PhilipsChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1124-3185
Laurelle NelsonChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Julia E ClarkChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7746-0599
Sophie Chien-Hui WenChildren's Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
The University of Queensland · AUChildren’s Health Queensland Hospital and Health Service · AUGriffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsChildren with severe needle phobia find vaccination extremely distressing and can remain unvaccinated, which puts them at an increased risk of contracting and transmitting vaccine preventable disease. Referral to a specialist or hospital service may occur when they cannot be safely vaccinated in the community, but engagement of allied health services can be inconsistent. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of a multidisciplinary, consumer-oriented model of care on vaccinations for needle phobic children.

methodsNeedle phobic children aged between 6 and 16 years attended multidisciplinary consultation, as part of a care package, to assess previous experiences and determine the level of intervention that was required to support vaccination. A multidisciplinary case meeting followed this appointment and an individualised plan formulated for each patient. The main outcome of the project was rate of successful vaccination.

resultsThe care package resulted in a successful vaccination rate of 83% (n = 20) with 69 vaccines administered across three clinics. Of those successful, 90% required multiple injections per visit. The majority of patients indicated moderate to high level of anxiety. Supportive care was escalated and de-escalated as tolerated.

conclusionsResults demonstrate the diversity of patients presenting with needle phobia and indicate an individualised, collaborative approach is preferable to a 'one size fits all' model of care. The study highlights a need for the development of guidelines that streamline the assessment and individualisation of procedural anxiety plans to meet patient needs and embed these processes into standard care.

Indexed as

VaccinationVaccinesAdolescentAppointments and SchedulesChildHumansReferral and ConsultationVaccinesbehaviouralgeneral paediatricsimmunisationpain

Identifiers

PMID35218256
PMCPMC9302978
OpenAlexW4214571792

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.