Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218202›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2022

Improved 60-day survival but impaired general health in Swedish ICU-COVID patients: An ambidirectional population-based study.

Gustaf Forsberg, Sören Berg, Anestis Divanoglou, Richard Levi, David Ekqvist, Åse Östholm Balkhed, Katarina Niward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gustaf ForsbergDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-1827
Sören BergDepartment of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, and Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Anestis DivanoglouDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, and Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Richard LeviDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, and Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
David EkqvistDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Region Östergötland, Linkoping, Sweden.
Åse Östholm BalkhedDepartment of Infectious Diseases, and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Katarina NiwardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurvival among critically ill COVID-19 patients varies between countries and time periods. Mortality rates up to 60% have been reported in intensive care units (ICUs). Standard-of-care has evolved throughout the pandemic. The purpose of the study was to explore management and mortality of COVID-19 ICU-patients during the first pandemic wave and assess their post-ICU health status.

methodsWe conducted an exploratory observational ambidirectional population-based study of ICU-patients with COVID-19 in a Swedish county during 1 March-30 June 2020. Primary outcome was 60-day mortality with secondary outcomes including treatments, complications, self-reported general health and dyspnoea post-discharge. Patients were consecutively divided into equal tertiles with cut-offs on April 4 and April 20, 2020, to analyse time trends.

resultsOne hundred patients, median age was 63 years, were included, and 60-day mortality rate was 22%. Ninety-one percent had moderate/severe ARDS and 88% required mechanical ventilation. In the first tertile of patients 60-day mortality was 33%, declining to 15% and 18% in the following two. This reduction paralleled increased use of thromboprophylaxis, less steep rise of treated ICU-patients per day and expanded ICU resources. Four months post-discharge, 63% of survivors reported self-assessed decline in general health retrospectively compared to prior COVID-19.

conclusionsIn this cohort, the initial 60-day mortality quickly declined, despite continuous admittance of critically ill patients. This was parallel to adaptation to increased workload and more intense thromboembolic prophylaxis. A majority of survivors reported declined general health four months after discharge. Further studies on long-term health status of ICU-survivors are indicated.

Indexed as

COVID-19Respiratory Distress SyndromeVenous ThromboembolismAftercareAnticoagulantsCritical IllnessHumansIntensive Care UnitsMiddle AgedPatient DischargeRespiration, ArtificialRetrospective StudiesSwedenAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID35218202
PMCPMC9111131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.