Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218103›Full record

ArticleThe journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research2022

Threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, and preterm birth during the first state of emergency for COVID-19 in 2020 in Japan.

Sumiyo Okawa, Yoshihiko Hosokawa, Keiko Nanishi, Masayoshi Zaitsu, Takahiro Tabuchi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sumiyo OkawaInstitute for Global Health Policy Research, Bureau of International Health Cooperation, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2197-7078
Yoshihiko HosokawaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Keiko NanishiOffice of International Academic Affairs, Graduate School of Medicine and Faculty of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Masayoshi ZaitsuDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan.
Takahiro TabuchiCancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.

Funding

Health Labour Sciences Research Grant 19FA1005Health Labour Sciences Research Grant 19FA1012The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grants 18H03062The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grants 19K19452The Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grants 21H04856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study examined the maternal experience of threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, or preterm birth before, during, and after the first state of emergency for COVID-19 in 2020 in Japan.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional, internet-based questionnaire survey. We recruited 600 postpartum women and divided them into three groups by date of delivery: before (October 2019-March 2020), during (April-May 2020), and after (June-October 2020) the first state of emergency. The outcome was the presence of at least one of the following complications: threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, and/or preterm birth. The prevalence ratios (PRs) of the outcome were calculated and compared among the three groups using a multivariable Poisson regression model with adjustment for potential confounders.

resultsOf the 553 women eligible for analysis, those who delivered during (PR 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47-0.99) and after (PR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42-0.90) the state of emergency were less likely to have experienced either threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, or preterm birth than those who delivered before the state of emergency. Among the adjustment variables, smoking at the time of survey (PR 1.68, 95% CI 1.01-2.80) and living in the prefectures with a population of >5 million (PR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51-0.97) were associated with the study outcome.

conclusionThreatened abortion, threatened premature labor, or preterm birth appeared to decrease during and after the first state of emergency in 2020. The longitudinal effects of coronavirus disease on maternal and newborn health should be monitored continuously.

Indexed as

Abortion, ThreatenedCOVID-19Obstetric Labor, PrematurePremature BirthCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornJapanMalePregnancyCOVID-19maternal healthpreterm birththreatened abortionthreatened premature labor

Identifiers

PMID35218103
PMCPMC9115260

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.