Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35218047›Full record

ArticleAnnals of the New York Academy of Sciences2022

Multiple micronutrient supplements versus iron-folic acid supplements and maternal anemia outcomes: an iron dose analysis.

Filomena Gomes, Rina Agustina, Robert E Black, Parul Christian, Kathryn G Dewey, Klaus Kraemer, Anuraj H Shankar, Emily R Smith, Andrew Thorne-Lyman, Alison Tumilowicz and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05682261 (The Effect of Multiple Micronutrient Supplements in Reducing Anemia Among Women of Reproductive Age Compared to Iron-folic Acid at Kebribeyah District in Somali Regional State, Ethiopia- A Community-based Individual Randomized Control Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05682261 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Effect of Multiple Micronutrient Supplements in Reducing Anemia Among Women of Reproductive Age Compared to Iron-folic Acid at Kebribeyah District in Somali Regional State, Ethiopia- A Community-based Individual Randomized Control Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorEthiopian Public Health InstituteRan2023 to 2023Enrolled265ConditionsAnemiaArmsUNIMMAP-MMS, IFA, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Filomena GomesThe New York Academy of Sciences, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1702-1433
Rina AgustinaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia - Dr Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-8464-1037
Robert E BlackJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID 0000-0001-9926-7984
Parul ChristianJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kathryn G DeweyUniversity of California, Davis, Davis, California.ORCID 0000-0002-4185-3451
Klaus KraemerJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Anuraj H ShankarUniversity of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Emily R SmithThe George Washington University, Washington, DC.
Andrew Thorne-LymanJohns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alison TumilowiczThe Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington.ORCID 0000-0002-8955-1479
Megan W BourassaThe New York Academy of Sciences, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1201-3397
Johns Hopkins University · USNew York Academy of Sciences · USGates Foundation · USGeorge Washington University · USUniversity of California, Davis · USUniversity of Indonesia · IDUniversity of Mataram · ID

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antenatal multiple micronutrient supplements (MMS) are more effective than iron and folic acid (IFA) supplements in reducing adverse pregnancy outcomes. Questions remain, however, about the ability of MMS to prevent anemia as effectively as IFA, especially at a lower dose of daily iron and in areas of high anemia prevalence. Analyzing data from 11 trials from a recent Cochrane review, we compared MMS to IFA, delivering either 30 or 60 mg of iron, in sustaining hemoglobin and preventing third trimester anemia and iron deficiency anemia (IDA), accounting for daily iron dose, total supplemental iron intake, and baseline prevalence of anemia. There were no differences between MMS and IFA in third trimester hemoglobin concentration or risks of anemia or IDA by iron dose or total supplemental iron consumed. MMS providing 30 mg of iron was comparable to IFA with 60 mg of iron: mean hemoglobin difference of -0.26 g/L (95% CI: -1.41 to 0.89), risk ratios of 0.99 (95% CI: 0.92-1.07) for anemia, and 1.31 (95% CI: 0.66-2.60) for IDA. Baseline prevalence of anemia did not explain heterogeneity in findings. Compared to IFA, MMS results in comparable hemoglobin concentration and protection against anemia during pregnancy, independently of iron dose.

Indexed as

AnemiaAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyDietary SupplementsFemaleFolic AcidHemoglobinsHumansIronMicronutrientsPregnancyFolic AcidHemoglobinsIronMicronutrientsanemiaironiron deficiency anemiamicronutrient supplementspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35218047
PMCPMC9306935
OpenAlexW4214517993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.