ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2022
Factors related to suspension of day-care services: an effective program for older users with declined ambulation to reduce care burden.
Article in European geriatric medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeDay-care services contribute to maintaining the daily living ability of older people cared for at home. This study aimed to detect factors that could impede the continuation of day-care services.
methodsWe collected clinical data of 132 older users (age = 82.8 ± 7.5 years; male:female = 49:83) utilizing our day-care center from April 2019 to March 2020. We evaluated age, sex, underlying disease, medication, family background, care level, food texture, physical ability, reasons for frequenting day-care centers, and combined medical/nursing care plans. Participants were divided into two groups: continuation (n = 51) and suspension (n = 81). The collected items were evaluated statistically using the chi-square test, Mann-Whitney test, and unpaired t test. Multivariate logistic analysis (forward-backward stepwise selection method) was added to the statistically significant items. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.
resultsThe comparison test detected statistical significance in Parkinson disease/Parkinsonism, pain complaints, day-service use, short-stay service use, day-care center use to reduce care burden, physical ability including ambulation, and availability of the major caregiver (p < 0.05). Day-care service use to reduce care burden (odds ratio 5.646, p < 0.05), use of short-stay and day-care services (odds ratio 4.798, p < 0.05), and low independent ambulation (odds ratio 0.585, p < 0.05) were the likely factors for suspended use (percentage of correct classification = 68.5%).
conclusionAn unreplaceable and effective program for day-service and short-stay services to improve the activities of daily living of older users and reduce care burden is required in day-care centers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.