ArticleJournal of digital imaging2022
A Multilevel Transfer Learning Technique and LSTM Framework for Generating Medical Captions for Limited CT and DBT Images.
Article in Journal of digital imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep Learning in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends.MedComm · 2025Review
- Multi-Branch CNN-LSTM Fusion Network-Driven System With BERT Semantic Evaluator for Radiology Reporting in Emergency Head CTs.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2025Article
- Compare three deep learning-based artificial intelligence models for classification of calcified lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter diagnostic study.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medical image captioning has been recently attracting the attention of the medical community. Also, generating captions for images involving multiple organs is an even more challenging task. Therefore, any attempt toward such medical image captioning becomes the need of the hour. In recent years, the rapid developments in deep learning approaches have made them an effective option for the analysis of medical images and automatic report generation. But analyzing medical images that are scarce and limited is hard, and it is difficult even with machine learning approaches. The concept of transfer learning can be employed in such applications that suffer from insufficient training data. This paper presents an approach to develop a medical image captioning model based on a deep recurrent architecture that combines Multi Level Transfer Learning (MLTL) framework with a Long Short-Term-Memory (LSTM) model. A basic MLTL framework with three models is designed to detect and classify very limited datasets, using the knowledge acquired from easily available datasets. The first model for the source domain uses the abundantly available non-medical images and learns the generalized features. The acquired knowledge is then transferred to the second model for the intermediate and auxiliary domain, which is related to the target domain. This information is then used for the final target domain, which consists of medical datasets that are very limited in nature. Therefore, the knowledge learned from a non-medical source domain is transferred to improve the learning in the target domain that deals with medical images. Then, a novel LSTM model, which is used for sequence generation and machine translation, is proposed to generate captions for the given medical image from the MLTL framework. To improve the captioning of the target sentence further, an enhanced multi-input Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model along with feature extraction techniques is proposed. This enhanced multi-input CNN model extracts the most important features of an image that help in generating a more precise and detailed caption of the medical image. Experimental results show that the proposed model performs well with an accuracy of 96.90%, with BLEU score of 76.9%, even with very limited datasets, when compared to the work reported in literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.