Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217938›Full record

Observational studyTechniques in coloproctology2022

Three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound to assess the validity of Goodsall's Rule and the Midline Rule in predicting the path of perianal fistula-in-ano and the location of the internal opening.

S Garcia-Botello, J Martín-Arévalo, R Martí-Fernández, D Moro-Valdezate, V Pla-Martí, A Espí-Macías

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Techniques in coloproctology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Anal fistula, there is more than meets the eye!Techniques in coloproctology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S Garcia-BotelloColorectal Surgery Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6921-4902
J Martín-ArévaloColorectal Surgery Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
R Martí-FernándezColorectal Surgery Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain. rosamartifernandez@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8061-5421
D Moro-ValdezateColorectal Surgery Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0425-8677
V Pla-MartíColorectal Surgery Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7644-8416
A Espí-MacíasColorectal Surgery Unit, Biomedical Research Institute INCLIVA, Hospital Clinico Universitario, Valencia, Spain.
Universitat de València · ESINCLIVA Health Research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorrect identification of the internal opening is essential in the management of perianal fistulae. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of Goodsall's Law and the Midline Rule in predicting the path of perianal fistula-in-ano and the location of the internal opening using 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound.

methodsAn observational study including patients diagnosed with fistula-in-ano, at our institution from January 2006 to December 2020 was performed. Location and distance from the anal verge of the external opening, internal opening, and the path of the fistulous tract were recorded during physical examination and endoanal ultrasound. Goodsall's and Midline rules were applied to all fistulae according to the location of the external opening. The location of the internal opening as predicted by either rule was then compared to the real location of the internal opening identified during endoanal ultrasound examination.

resultsNine hundred and nine patients [657 (72.3%) males, mean age 50.78 (49.84-51.72) years] were included. 665 (73.2%) of fistulae were transsphinteric. Concordance between predicted internal opening site and the true internal opening location was 0.601 (good match) for Goodsall's rule, and 0.416 (moderate match) for the Midline rule. Goodsall's rule proved to be more predictive in the anterior plane (p < 0.001). Both rules were more likely to make a correct diagnosis in posterior fistulae located 4.5-7.5 mm from the anal verge.

conclusionsBoth Midline and Goodsall's rules are highly predictive of the course of fistula tracts located in the posterior plane, and are lower for anterior located fistulae, female patients and when the external opening is located further from the anal verge.

Indexed as

Rectal FistulaAnal CanalEndosonographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPerineumPhysical ExaminationUltrasonographyAnal fistulaEndoanal ultrasoundGoodsallInternal openingMidline

Identifiers

PMID35217938
OpenAlexW4214693201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.