Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217914›Full record

ArticleEuropean spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society2022

Epidemiological trends of low back pain at the global, regional, and national levels.

Linfeng Wang, Hong Ye, Zhichao Li, Chengwu Lu, Jian Ye, Mingxin Liao, Xiaojie Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. [Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic and uniportal interlaminar endoscopic decompression in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis].Zhongguo xiu fu chong jian wai ke za zhi = Zhongguo xiufu chongjian waike zazhi = Chinese journal of reparative and reconstructive surgery · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Linfeng Wang *Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Nanping First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 317 Zhongshan Road, Yanping District, Nanping City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Hong Ye *Department of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Nanping First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 317 Zhongshan Road, Yanping District, Nanping City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Zhichao LiDepartment of Orthopedics, Shaowu Municipal Hospital of Fujian Province, Shaowu City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Chengwu LuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Nanping First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 317 Zhongshan Road, Yanping District, Nanping City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Jian YeDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Nanping First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 317 Zhongshan Road, Yanping District, Nanping City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Mingxin LiaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Nanping First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 317 Zhongshan Road, Yanping District, Nanping City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Xiaojie ChenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Affiliated Nanping First Hospital, Fujian Medical University, 317 Zhongshan Road, Yanping District, Nanping City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China. fjsnasdyyy@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0304-7966

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to assess the global, regional, and national burdens of low back pain (LBP) from 1990 to 2019 by gender, age, and the sociodemographic index (SDI) from the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 study.

methodsThe number of incident cases, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), age-standardized incidence rates, and age-standardized DALY rates during 1990-2019 were obtained from the GBD 2019 study. The estimated annual percentage changes (EAPCs) in the age-standardized incidence rates and age-standardized DALY rates were determined to measure the temporal trends of LBP.

resultsIn 2019, there were an estimated 223.5 million cases of LBP and 63.7 million LBP-related DALYs worldwide. During 1990-2019, the age-standardized incidence rate [EAPC =  - 0.41; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 0.46 to - 0.36] and age-standardized DALY rate decreased (EAPC =  - 0.51; 95% CI - 0.56 to - 0.46) globally. The age-standardized incidence rate of LBP decreased the most in low-middle SDI regions. The age-standardized incidence rate of LBP decreased the most in South Asia (EAPC, - 1.51), East Asia (EAPC, - 0.68), and Australasia (EAPC, - 0.26). The incidence in male subjects was lower than that in female subjects. The largest decreases in the age-standardized incidence rate and age-standardized DALY rate of LBP were observed in India, and China.

conclusionsThe global age-standardized incidence rate and age-standardized DALY rate of LBP showed a downward trend, especially in East and South Asia. In addition, a heavier burden of LBP was observed in older and female populations.

Indexed as

Low Back PainAgedChinaFemaleGlobal Burden of DiseaseGlobal HealthHumansIncidenceMaleQuality-Adjusted Life YearsEpidemiologicalGlobal burden of diseaseLow back painTrends

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.