Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217898›Full record

Trial reportActa neurochirurgica2022

Frequency dependency of therapeutic efficacy in dorsal root ganglion stimulation for neuropathic pain.

G S Piedade, S Gillner, P S McPhillips, J Vesper, P J Slotty

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Acta neurochirurgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Pathology of pain and its implications for therapeutic interventions.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024
    Review
  4. Mechanisms of Action of Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

G S PiedadeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany. guilherme.santospiedade@med.uni-duesseldorf.de.
S GillnerDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
P S McPhillipsDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
J VesperDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
P J SlottyDepartment of Functional Neurosurgery and Stereotaxy, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Moorenstr. 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe influence of the stimulation frequency on the outcomes of dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRG-S) to treat pain is not well understood. It is assumed that specific neural components dedicated to different tasks in the DRG can be preferably influenced at specific frequencies. The identification of frequencies designed for the type of pain and the ratio of neuropathic versus nociceptive pain might improve overall pain control and open new indications in DRG-S.

methodWe report on a randomized double-blind clinical trial with a crossover design. Patients with a permanent DRG-S system underwent phases of stimulation with 20 Hz, 40 Hz, 60 Hz, 80 Hz, and sham in a randomized order. Each phase lasted for 4 days and was followed by a 2-day washout period. Pain intensity and quality of life were assessed with visual analog scale (VAS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), EQ-5D, and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Analgesics intake was assessed.

resultsOverall 19 patients were included in the study. CRPS was the most frequent pain etiology (7). Five patients had a PainDetect score of 12 or lower at baseline. The mean VAS before the system was implanted was 8.6 and 3.9 at the baseline. Pain intensity was reduced to 3.7 by the stimulation with 20 Hz but increased with higher frequencies reaching 5.8 at 80 Hz. A significant difference among the groups was shown over all variables examined (VAS, MPQ, EQ-5D, BDI). The best results were seen at 20 Hz for all variables, including the smallest increase in pain medication consumption.

conclusionsThe choice of the stimulation frequency shows a clear influence on pain reduction and quality of life. Lower stimulation frequencies seem to be most effective in neuropathic pain. Further studies are required to determine whether specific frequencies should be preferred based on the condition treated.

Indexed as

NeuralgiaSpinal Cord StimulationGanglia, SpinalHumansPain ManagementPain MeasurementQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeDorsal root ganglion stimulationFrequencyNeuropathic pain

Identifiers

PMID35217898
PMCPMC8967770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.