Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217816›Full record

ArticleActa pharmacologica Sinica2022

The role of REV-ERB in NASH.

Kristine Griffett, Matthew E Hayes, Michael P Boeckman, Thomas P Burris

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta pharmacologica Sinica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Kristine GriffettCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, Washington University in St. Louis and University of Health Sciences & Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Matthew E HayesUniversity of Florida Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA.
Michael P BoeckmanCenter for Clinical Pharmacology, Washington University in St. Louis and University of Health Sciences & Pharmacy, St. Louis, MO, 63110, USA.
Thomas P BurrisUniversity of Florida Genetics Institute, Gainesville, FL, 32610, USA. burris.thomas@ufl.edu.
University of Florida · USUniversity of Health Sciences and Pharmacy · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Targeting REV-ERB to treat Alzheimer's diseaseRF1AG060769 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BURRIS, THOMAS P · 2019 to 2019
$3.7M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG060769
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

REV-ERBs are atypical nuclear receptors as they function as ligand-regulated transcriptional repressors. The natural ligand for the REV-ERBs (REV-ERBα and REV-ERBβ) is heme, and heme-binding results in recruitment of transcriptional corepressor proteins such as N-CoR that mediates repression of REV-ERB target genes. These two receptors regulate a large range of physiological processes including several important in the pathophysiology of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). These include carbohydrate and lipid metabolism as well as inflammatory pathways. A number of synthetic REV-ERB agonists have been developed as chemical tools and they show efficacy in animal models of NASH. Here, we will review the functions of REV-ERB with regard to their relevance to NASH as well as the potential to target REV-ERB for treatment of this disease.

Indexed as

Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver DiseaseNuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group D, Member 1AnimalsCircadian RhythmHemeLigandsTranscription FactorsHemeLigandsNuclear Receptor Subfamily 1, Group D, Member 1Transcription Factorscircadian clockHemeinflammationlipid and glucose metabolismNASHREV-ERB

Identifiers

PMID35217816
PMCPMC9061770
OpenAlexW4214479176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.