Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217802›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2022

Prevalent versus incident breast cancers: benefits of clinical and radiological monitoring in women with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants.

Claire Saule, Solveig Menu-Hespel, Matthieu Carton, Caroline Malhaire, Pascal Cherel, Fabien Reyal, Marine Le Mentec, Eugénie Guillot, Anne Donnadieu, Nasrine Callet and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Guidelines, guidelines everywhere-and still I'm not sure what to do.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claire Saule *Institut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France. claire.saule@curie.fr.ORCID 0000-0002-9639-8986
Solveig Menu-Hespel *CHU, Department of Genetics, Lille, France.
Matthieu CartonInstitut Curie, Department of Biometry, DRCI, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6793-3273
Caroline MalhaireInstitut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Pascal CherelInstitut Curie, Department of Medical Imaging, Saint-Cloud, France.
Fabien ReyalInstitut Curie, Department of Surgery, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Marine Le MentecInstitut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Eugénie GuillotInstitut Curie, Department of Surgery, Saint-Cloud, France.
Anne DonnadieuInstitut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Cloud, France.
Nasrine CalletInstitut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Sophie FrankInstitut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Florence CoussyInstitut Curie, Department of Medical Oncology, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Dominique Stoppa-LyonnetInstitut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5438-8309
Emmanuelle Mouret-FourmeInstitut Curie, Department of Genetics, PSL Research University, Paris, France.
Université Paris Sciences et Lettres · FRInserm · FRInstitut Curie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with pathogenic germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 variants have a higher risk of breast cancer than in the general population. International guidelines recommend specific clinical and radiological breast follow-up. This specific breast screening program has already been shown to be of clinical benefit, but no information is available concerning the use of prognostic factors or specific survival to guide follow-up decisions. We evaluated "high-risk" screening in a retrospective single-center study of 520 women carrying pathogenic germline variants of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene treated for breast cancer between January 2000 and December 2016. We compared two groups of women: the incidental breast cancer group (IBCG) were followed before breast cancer diagnosis (N = 103), whereas the prevalent breast cancer group (PBCG) (N = 417) had no specific follow-up for high risk before breast cancer diagnosis. Breast cancers were diagnosed at an earlier stage in the IBCG than in the PBCG: T0 in 64% versus 19% of tumors, (p < 0.00001), and N0 in 90% vs. 75% (p < 0.00001), respectively. Treatment differed significantly between the 2 groups: less neoadjuvant chemotherapy (7.1% vs. 28.5%, p < 0.00001), adjuvant chemotherapy (47.7% vs. 61.9%, p = 0.004) and more mastectomies (60% vs. 42% p < 0.0001) in the IBCG vs PBCG groups respectively. Overall and breast cancer-specific mortality were similar between the two groups. However, the patients in the IBCG had a significantly longer metastasis-free survival than those in the PBCG, at three years (96.9% [95% CI 93.5-100] vs. 92.30% [95% CI 89.8-94.9]; p = 0.02), suggesting a possible long-term survival advantage.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBRCA1 ProteinBRCA2 ProteinFemaleGenes, BRCA2Germ-Line MutationHumansRetrospective StudiesBRCA1 ProteinBRCA1 protein, humanBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID35217802
PMCPMC9436925
OpenAlexW4214732473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.