Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217776›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2022

The novel genus, 'Candidatus Phosphoribacter', previously identified as Tetrasphaera, is the dominant polyphosphate accumulating lineage in EBPR wastewater treatment plants worldwide.

C M Singleton, F Petriglieri, K Wasmund, M Nierychlo, Z Kondrotaite, J F Petersen, M Peces, M S Dueholm, M Wagner, P H Nielsen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 100 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Multiple extracellular polymeric substance pathways transcribed byApplied and environmental microbiology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparative transcription profiles ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Wastewater Treatment with Bacterial Representatives of theInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Expanding the Diversity ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

C M SingletonCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9688-8208
F PetriglieriCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
K WasmundCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
M NierychloCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Z KondrotaiteCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-6060
J F PetersenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
M PecesCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2522-7490
M S DueholmCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4135-2670
M WagnerCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9778-7684
P H NielsenCenter for Microbial Communities, Department of Chemistry and Bioscience, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark. phn@bio.aau.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6402-1877
Aalborg University · DKUniversity of Vienna · AT

Funding

Villum Fonden (Villum Foundation) 16578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The bacterial genus Tetrasphaera encompasses abundant polyphosphate accumulating organisms (PAOs) that are responsible for enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) in wastewater treatment plants. Recent analyses of genomes from pure cultures revealed that 16S rRNA genes cannot resolve the lineage, and that Tetrasphaera spp. are from several different genera within the Dermatophilaceae. Here, we examine 14 recently recovered high-quality metagenome-assembled genomes from wastewater treatment plants containing full-length 16S rRNA genes identified as Tetrasphaera, 11 of which belong to the uncultured Tetrasphaera clade 3. We find that this clade represents two distinct genera, named here Ca. Phosphoribacter and Ca. Lutibacillus, and reveal that the widely used model organism Tetrasphaera elongata is less relevant for physiological predictions of this uncultured group. Ca. Phosphoribacter incorporates species diversity unresolved at the 16S rRNA gene level, with the two most abundant and often co-occurring species encoding identical V1-V3 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence variants but different metabolic capabilities, and possibly, niches. Both Ca. P. hodrii and Ca. P. baldrii were visualised using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH), and PAO capabilities were confirmed with FISH-Raman microspectroscopy and phosphate cycling experiments. Ca. Phosphoribacter represents the most abundant former Tetrasphaera lineage and PAO in EPBR systems in Denmark and globally.

Indexed as

ActinomycetalesWater PurificationBioreactorsPhosphorusPolyphosphatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageWastewaterPhosphorusPolyphosphatesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSewageWastewater

Identifiers

PMID35217776
PMCPMC9123174
OpenAlexW4214667828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.