Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217745›Full record

ReviewBritish dental journal2022

Unlocking the potential of NHS primary care dental datasets.

Deborah Moore, Thomas Allen, Dwayne Boyers, Kate McKenzie, Wendy Thompson, Blessing Nyakutsikwa, Iain Pretty, Martin Tickle

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in British dental journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Deborah MooreResearch Associate, Dental Public Health, The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Dental Health Unit, Lloyd Street North, Manchester Science Park, M15 6SE, UK. deborah.moore-2@manchester.ac.uk.
Thomas AllenResearch Fellow, Health Economics, Danish Centre for Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; The University of Manchester, Manchester Centre for Health Economics, Room 4.305 Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Dwayne BoyersResearch Fellow, Health Economics Research Unit, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, AB25 2ZD, UK.
Kate McKenzieResearch Assistant, Dental Public Health, The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Dental Health Unit, Lloyd Street North, Manchester Science Park, M15 6SE, UK.
Wendy ThompsonNIHR Clinical Lecturer, The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Coupland 3, M13 9PL, UK.
Blessing NyakutsikwaResearch Associate, Dental Public Health, The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Dental Health Unit, Lloyd Street North, Manchester Science Park, M15 6SE, UK.
Iain PrettyProfessor of Public Health Dentistry, The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Dental Health Unit, Lloyd Street North, Manchester Science Park, M15 6SE, UK.
Martin TickleProfessor of Dental Public Health and Primary Care, The University of Manchester, Division of Dentistry, Coupland 3, M13 9PL, UK.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HERU1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Maximising the use of routinely collected health data for research is a key part of the UK Government's Industrial Strategy. Rich data are generated by NHS primary care dental services, but the extent of their use in research is unknown.Aims To profile the utility of the post-2006 NHS dental datasets for research, map how they have been used to date and develop recommendations to maximise their utility.Methods The content of and access to the four UK NHS dental datasets was collated using publicly available information and a free-text questionnaire, completed by the relevant data controllers. A scoping review was carried out to identify and map literature that has utilised NHS dental activity data.Results The contents of the UK NHS dental activity datasets are described, alongside how they may be accessed for research. Strengths and weaknesses of these datasets for research are highlighted. The scoping review identified 33 studies which had utilised NHS dental activity data since 2006. We classified 15 as public health practice, 11 as service evaluation and 7 as research.Conclusion In comparision to other NHS activity datasets, it appears that the UK dental datasets have been underutilised for research. We make 11 recommendations on how their utility for research may be increased.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareState Medicine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.