Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217713›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2022

Gut Microbiome Characteristics in feral and domesticated horses from different geographic locations.

Li Ang, Gabriel Vinderola, Akihito Endo, Juha Kantanen, Chen Jingfeng, Ana Binetti, Patricia Burns, Shi Qingmiao, Ding Suying, Yu Zujiang and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Increased abundance of Limosilactobacillus reuteri in the gut of selectively bred high-tameness mice and its association with behavioural changes.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Synergistic effects ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Rewilded horses in European nature conservation - a genetics, ethics, and welfare perspective.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Li AngHealth Management Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Gabriel VinderolaInstituto de Lactología Industrial (INLAIN, UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Akihito EndoDepartment of Food, Aroma and Cosmetic Chemistry, Tokyo University of Agriculture, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7108-1202
Juha KantanenProduction Systems, Natural Resources Institute Finland, Jokioinen, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-6373
Chen JingfengHealth Management Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ana BinettiInstituto de Lactología Industrial (INLAIN, UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Patricia BurnsInstituto de Lactología Industrial (INLAIN, UNL-CONICET), Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina.
Shi QingmiaoDepartment of Henan Gene Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Ding SuyingHealth Management Centre, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
Yu ZujiangDepartment of Henan Gene Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China.
David Rios-CovianDepartment and Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), Asturias, Spain.
Anastasia MantziariFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8485-2224
Shea BeasleyFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3512-5690
Carlos Gomez-GallegoFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0219-1827
Miguel GueimondeDepartment and Microbiology and Biochemistry of Dairy Products, Instituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias (IPLA-CSIC), Asturias, Spain. mgueimonde@ipla.csic.es.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0192-901X
Seppo SalminenFunctional Foods Forum, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. seppo.salminen@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9737-7642
First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University · CNUniversity of Turku · FIConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARInstituto de Productos Lácteos de Asturias · ESNatural Resources Institute Finland · FITokyo University of Agriculture · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Domesticated horses live under different conditions compared with their extinct wild ancestors. While housed, medicated and kept on a restricted source of feed, the microbiota of domesticated horses is hypothesized to be altered. We assessed the fecal microbiome of 57 domestic and feral horses from different locations on three continents, observing geographical differences. A higher abundance of eukaryota (p < 0.05) and viruses (p < 0.05) and lower of archaea (p < 0.05) were found in feral animals when compared with domestic ones. The abundance of genes coding for microbe-produced enzymes involved in the metabolism of carbohydrates was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in feral animals regardless of the geographic origin. Differences in the fecal resistomes between both groups of animals were also noted. The domestic/captive horse microbiomes were enriched in genes conferring resistance to tetracycline, likely reflecting the use of this antibiotic in the management of these animals. Our data showed an impoverishment of the fecal microbiome in domestic horses with diet, antibiotic exposure and hygiene being likely drivers. The results offer a view of the intestinal microbiome of horses and the impact of domestication or captivity, which may uncover novel targets for modulating the microbiome of horses to enhance animal health and well-being.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaAnimalsAnimals, WildDomesticationFecesHorses

Identifiers

PMID35217713
PMCPMC8881449
OpenAlexW4214520601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.