Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217660›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Natural variation in Glume Coverage 1 causes naked grains in sorghum.

Peng Xie, Sanyuan Tang, Chengxuan Chen, Huili Zhang, Feifei Yu, Chao Li, Huimin Wei, Yi Sui, Chuanyin Wu, Xianmin Diao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Agronomic potential of plant-specific Gγ proteins.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. R2R3 MYB transcription factor SbMYBHv33 negatively regulates sorghum biomass accumulation and salt tolerance.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Peng XieState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China. pxie@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1962-9995
Sanyuan TangState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
Chengxuan ChenState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
Huili ZhangState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
Feifei YuState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
Chao LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
Huimin WeiState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China.
Yi SuiInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 100081, Beijing, P. R. China.
Chuanyin WuInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 100081, Beijing, P. R. China.
Xianmin DiaoInstitute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 100081, Beijing, P. R. China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8957-4101
Yaorong WuState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China. yrwu@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4752-6275
Qi XieState Key Laboratory of Plant Genomics, Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, The Innovative Academy of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100101, Beijing, P. R. China. qxie@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-9093

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the most critical steps in cereal threshing is the ease with which seeds are detached from sticky glumes. Naked grains with low glume coverage have dramatically increased threshing efficiency and seed quality. Here, we demonstrate that GC1 (Glume Coverage 1), encoding an atypical G protein γ subunit, negatively regulates sorghum glume coverage. Naturally truncated variations of GC1 C-terminus accumulate at higher protein levels and affect the stability of a patatin-related phospholipase SbpPLAII-1. A strong positive selection signature around the GC1 genic region is found in the naked sorghum cultivars. Our findings reveal a crucial event during sorghum domestication through a subtle regulation of glume development by GC1 C-terminus variation, and establish a strategy for future breeding of naked grains.

Indexed as

SorghumDomesticationEdible GrainPlant BreedingSeeds

Identifiers

PMID35217660
PMCPMC8881591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.