Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217656›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Cost-effectiveness of sleeping sickness elimination campaigns in five settings of the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Marina Antillon, Ching-I Huang, Ronald E Crump, Paul E Brown, Rian Snijders, Erick Mwamba Miaka, Matt J Keeling, Kat S Rock, Fabrizio Tediosi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cytological profiling of trypanocidal principles fromPhytomedicine plus : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Modelling morbidity for neglected tropical diseases: the long and winding road from cumulative exposure to long-term pathology.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. ModellingJournal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Marina AntillonEpidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Basel, 4123, Switzerland. marina.antillon@swisstph.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-0235-6030
Ching-I HuangZeeman Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8329-8310
Ronald E CrumpZeeman Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9884-4900
Paul E BrownZeeman Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Rian SnijdersEpidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Basel, 4123, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2432-9818
Erick Mwamba MiakaProgramme National de Lutte contre la Trypanosomiase Humaine Africaine (PNLTHA), Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Matt J KeelingZeeman Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Kat S Rock *Zeeman Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK. k.s.rock@warwick.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-8414-7648
Fabrizio Tediosi *Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Basel, 4123, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8671-9400

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gambiense human African trypanosomiasis (gHAT) is marked for elimination of transmission by 2030, but the disease persists in several low-income countries. We couple transmission and health outcomes models to examine the cost-effectiveness of four gHAT elimination strategies in five settings - spanning low- to high-risk - of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Alongside passive screening in fixed health facilities, the strategies include active screening at average or intensified coverage levels, alone or with vector control with a scale-back algorithm when no cases are reported for three consecutive years. In high or moderate-risk settings, costs of gHAT strategies are primarily driven by active screening and, if used, vector control. Due to the cessation of active screening and vector control, most investments (75-80%) are made by 2030 and vector control might be cost-saving while ensuring elimination of transmission. In low-risk settings, costs are driven by passive screening, and minimum-cost strategies consisting of active screening and passive screening lead to elimination of transmission by 2030 with high probability.

Indexed as

Trypanosomiasis, AfricanAnimalsCost-Benefit AnalysisDemocratic Republic of the CongoHumansMass ScreeningTrypanosoma brucei gambiense

Identifiers

PMID35217656
PMCPMC8881616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.