Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217642›Full record

ReviewBone research2022

Computer vision-aided bioprinting for bone research.

Changxi Liu, Liqiang Wang, Weijie Lu, Jia Liu, Chengliang Yang, Chunhai Fan, Qian Li, Yujin Tang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bone research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Nonlinear Harmonics: A Gateway to Enhanced Image Contrast and Material Discrimination.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Bioprinting extracellular vesicles as a "cell-free" regenerative medicine approach.Extracellular vesicles and circulating nucleic acids · 2023
    Review
  11. Bio-high entropy alloys: Progress, challenges, and opportunities.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Changxi LiuState Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Liqiang WangState Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China. wang_liqiang@sjtu.edu.cn.
Weijie LuState Key Laboratory of Metal Matrix Composites, School of Material Science and Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, No. 800 Dongchuan Road, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Jia LiuAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang, Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, 533000, China.
Chengliang YangAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang, Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, 533000, China.
Chunhai FanSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Qian LiSchool of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, National Center for Translational Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, China.
Yujin TangAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang, Medical University for Nationalities, Baise, Guangxi, 533000, China. tangyujin196709@163.com.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNAffiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University for Nationalities · CN

Funding

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Automatic Detection Technology and Instrument Foundation (Automatic Detection Technology and Instrument in Guangxi Key Laboratory) 2019GXYSOF01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioprinting is an emerging additive manufacturing technology that has enormous potential in bone implantation and repair. The insufficient accuracy of the shape of bioprinted parts is a primary clinical barrier that prevents widespread utilization of bioprinting, especially for bone design with high-resolution requirements. During the last five years, the use of computer vision for process control has been widely practiced in the manufacturing field. Computer vision can improve the performance of bioprinting for bone research with respect to various aspects, including accuracy, resolution, and cell survival rate. Hence, computer vision plays a substantial role in addressing the current defect problem in bioprinting for bone research. In this review, recent advances in the application of computer vision in bioprinting for bone research are summarized and categorized into three groups based on different defect types: bone scaffold process control, deep learning, and cell viability models. The collection of printing parameters, data processing, and feedback of bioprinting information, which ultimately improves printing capabilities, are further discussed. We envision that computer vision may offer opportunities to accelerate bioprinting development and provide a new perception for bone research.

Identifiers

PMID35217642
PMCPMC8881598
OpenAlexW4214557432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.