Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217615›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Opinion: Nationally reported metrics can't adequately guide transformative change in biodiversity policy.

Sara Fraixedas, Tomas Roslin, Laura H Antão, Juha Pöyry, Anna-Liisa Laine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Incorporating citizen science into IUCN Red List assessments.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Growth of non-English-language literature on biodiversity conservation.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sara FraixedasResearch Centre for Ecological Change, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-1407-0387
Tomas RoslinDepartment of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07 Uppsala, Sweden; tomas.roslin@helsinki.fi anna-liisa.laine@uzh.ch.
Laura H AntãoResearch Centre for Ecological Change, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6612-9366
Juha PöyryBiodiversity Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, 00790 Finland.ORCID 0000-0002-5548-1046
Anna-Liisa LaineResearch Centre for Ecological Change, Organismal and Evolutionary Biology Research Programme, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland; tomas.roslin@helsinki.fi anna-liisa.laine@uzh.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

BiodiversityEnvironmental PolicyDecision MakingEndangered SpeciesExtinction, BiologicalHumans

Identifiers

PMID35217615
PMCPMC8892539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.