Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217603›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Modeling suggests gene editing combined with vaccination could eliminate a persistent disease in livestock.

Gertje Eta Leony Petersen, Jaap B Buntjer, Fiona S Hely, Timothy John Byrne, Andrea Doeschl-Wilson

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Gertje Eta Leony PetersenAbacusBio Ltd, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; gpetersen@abacusbio.co.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-2956-0426
Jaap B BuntjerThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Scotland.
Fiona S HelyAbacusBio Ltd, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6134-7142
Timothy John ByrneAbacusBio International, Roslin Innovation Centre, The University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Scotland.
Andrea Doeschl-WilsonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush EH25 9RG, Scotland.ORCID 0000-0002-2658-6973
Roslin Institute · GBAgriculture and Food · AU

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/T004401/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent breakthroughs in gene-editing technologies that can render individual animals fully resistant to infections may offer unprecedented opportunities for controlling future epidemics in farm animals. Yet, their potential for reducing disease spread is poorly understood as the necessary theoretical framework for estimating epidemiological effects arising from gene-editing applications is currently lacking. Here, we develop semistochastic modeling approaches to investigate how the adoption of gene editing may affect infectious disease prevalence in farmed animal populations and the prospects and time scale for disease elimination. We apply our models to the porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), one of the most persistent global livestock diseases to date. Whereas extensive control efforts have shown limited success, recent production of gene-edited pigs that are fully resistant to the PRRS virus have raised expectations for eliminating this deadly disease. Our models predict that disease elimination on a national scale would be difficult to achieve if gene editing was used as the only disease control. However, from a purely epidemiological perspective, disease elimination may be achievable within 3 to 6 y, if gene editing were complemented with widespread and sufficiently effective vaccination. Besides strategic distribution of genetically resistant animals, several other key determinants underpinning the epidemiological impact of gene editing were identified.

Indexed as

Gene EditingVaccinationAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsLivestockPorcine Reproductive and Respiratory SyndromePorcine respiratory and reproductive syndrome virusProof of Concept StudySwineCRISPR/Cas9gene editinginfectious diseasemathematical modelPRRS

Identifiers

PMID35217603
PMCPMC8892294
OpenAlexW4214492083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.