Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35217457›Full record

ArticleNurse education today2022

Nursing students' and faculty members' experiences of online education during COVID-19 across Southeast Asia: A Photovoice study.

Wipada Kunaviktikul, Emily Ang, Ns Syamikar Baridwan, Alexandra Belle Bernal, Luz Barbara P Dones, Jo Leah Flores, Rachel Freedman-Doan, Areewan Klunklin, Wan Ling Lee, Chia-Chin Lin and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nurse education today, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Nursing lecturers' perception toward E-learning approaches used in nursing colleges: Scoping review.Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Wipada KunaviktikulFaculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Thailand; Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand. Electronic address: Wipada.ku@cmu.ac.th.
Emily AngAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: nuranke@nus.edu.sg.
Ns Syamikar BaridwanDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia.
Alexandra Belle BernalCollege of Nursing, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines. Electronic address: asbernal1@up.edu.ph.
Luz Barbara P DonesCollege of Nursing, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines. Electronic address: lpdones@up.edu.ph.
Jo Leah FloresCollege of Nursing, University of the Philippines Manila, Philippines. Electronic address: jaflores4@up.edu.ph.
Rachel Freedman-DoanFaculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Electronic address: Rachel.freedman.doan@gmail.com.
Areewan KlunklinFaculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Electronic address: Areewan.k@cmu.ac.th.
Wan Ling LeeDepartment of Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Malaysia. Electronic address: wllee@um.edu.my.
Chia-Chin LinSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong; Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Charity Foundation, Hong Kong. Electronic address: cclin@hku.hk.
Tzu Tsun LukSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong. Electronic address: lukkevin@hku.hk.
Anh T H NguyenFaculty of Nursing, Phenikaa University, Viet Nam. Electronic address: anh.nguyenthihong@phenikaa-uni.edu.vn.
Mohd Said NurumalDepartment of Critical Care Nursing, Kulliyyah of Nursing, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia. Electronic address: mohdsaid@iium.edu.my.
Agus SetiawanDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia. Electronic address: a-setiawan@ui.ac.id.
Thandar Soe Sumaiyah JamaluddinDepartment of Medical-Surgical Nursing, Kulliyyah of Nursing, International Islamic University Malaysia, Malaysia. Electronic address: sumaiyah@iium.edu.my.
T Q HuyVietnam Nurses Association, Viet Nam; Thang Long University, Viet Nam. Electronic address: Huytq@thanglong.edu.vn.
Patraporn TungpunkomFaculty of Nursing, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Electronic address: Patraporn.t@cmu.ac.th.
Ns Dwi Nurviyandari Kusuma WatiDepartment of Community Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia. Electronic address: dwi.nurviyandari@ui.ac.id.
Xinyi XuSchool of Nursing, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong. Electronic address: xuxinyi@connect.hku.hk.
Shefaly ShoreyAlice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore. Electronic address: nurssh@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has caused extraordinary disruptions to education systems globally, forcing a rapid switch from conventional to online education. Although some qualitative studies have been carried out exploring the online education experiences of nursing students and faculty members during the COVID-19 pandemic, to our knowledge, no study has used the Photovoice approach.

objectivesTo explore the experiences of nursing students and faculty members as related to online education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

designA descriptive qualitative design using Photovoice was adopted.

settingThe study took place across five countries and one city in Southeast Asia (Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Thailand, Vietnam, and Hong Kong).

participantsFifty-two nursing students and twenty-eight nursing faculty members who participated in online education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodsEach participant submitted one photo substantiated with written reflections. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Ethical approval was obtained from institution-specific ethics boards.

resultsThree themes and eleven sub-themes emerged from the data. The three main themes were: 1) Psychological roadblocks to online education; 2) Developing resilience despite adversities; and 3) Online education: What worked and what did not.

conclusionThrough Photovoice, the reflections revealed that nursing students and faculty members were generally overwhelmed with the online education experience. At the same time, participants were satisfied with the flexibility and convenience, opportunities for professional and personal development and safety afforded by online education. However, concerns over academic integrity, practical skills and clinical competencies, engagement and participation, the duality of technology and social isolation out-shadowed the advantages. It is worthwhile to explore the concerns raised to enhance online education across the nursing curriculum.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education, DistanceStudents, NursingFaculty, NursingHumansPandemicsNursing facultyNursing studentsOnline educationPandemicPhotovoice

Identifiers

PMID35217457
PMCPMC8860478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.