ArticleEvaluation and program planning2022
Advancing the science of evaluating Collegiate Recovery Program processes and outcomes: A recovery capital perspective.
Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adolescent Self-Reported Recovery for Substance Use in Illinois: Statewide Representative Epidemiological Study.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2026Article
- Evaluating institutional planning around collegiate recovery programs: considerations of student awareness and a socio-ecological framework.Journal of American college health : J of ACH · 2026Article
- Sustaining collegiate recovery programs: a literature review and SWOT analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Developing a collegiate recovery program from the ground up: identifying priorities, promoting collaboration, assessing needs, and offering recommendations.Addiction science & clinical practice · 2025Article
- Characterizing Collegiate Recovery Programs in the United States and Canada: A Survey of Program Directors.Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs · 2025Article
- Recovery resources for college students: Leveraging web scraping to unveil current estimates.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024Article
- Characteristics of Students Participating in Collegiate Recovery Programs and the Impact of COVID-19: An Updated National Longitudinal Study.Addiction research & theory · 2024Article
- A Socio-Ecological Model for Collegiate Recovery Programs.Addiction research & theory · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Collegiate recovery programs (CRPs) offer resources and programming for postsecondary students in addiction recovery to ensure they can initiate or maintain their recovery and complete college. To achieve these goals, CRPs offer a variety of activities that research and theory suggests should produce positive outcomes among their students; yet the lack of systematic evaluation research in this area means it is unknown which programming components may drive outcomes. Recovery capital theory posits a variety of factors at multiple ecological levels that might influence students' recovery experience and their engagement and success in community programs like CRPs. To address this complexity in research and evaluation work on CRPs, we provide a recovery capital-oriented theory of change and logic model for CRP evaluations, and demonstrate how this model could be used with an exemplar case. This is followed by a recovery capital-oriented data collection toolkit for future research and evaluation. These efforts should help to inform program planners and evaluators interested in understanding the influence of the ecosystem of recovery-oriented systems of care in CRPs for emerging adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.