ArticleThe Annals of thoracic surgery2022
A Novel Device for Intraoperative Direct Visualization of a Pressurized Root in Aortic Valve Repair.
Article in The Annals of thoracic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Design and evaluation of valve interventions using ex vivo biomechanical modeling: the Stanford experience.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Review
- Valve-sparing aortic root replacement: Strategies to avoid residual aortic regurgitation.JTCVS open · 2025Article
- The 170°/190° commissure positioning technique for bicuspid aortic valve repair using valve-sparing aortic root replacement.JTCVS techniques · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeOne major challenge in generating reproducible aortic valve (AV) repair results is the inability to assess AV morphology under physiologic pressure. A transparent intraoperative AV visualization device was designed and manufactured. DESCRIPTION: This device comprises an open proximal end, a cantilevered edge to allow attachment of the device to the aorta or graft, a distal viewing surface, and 2 side ports for fluid delivery and air removal. EVALUATION: The performance of the device was evaluated ex vivo using normal porcine AV in situ (n = 3), porcine AV after valve-sparing aortic root replacement (VSARR) (n = 3), porcine pulmonary valve in the Ross procedure (n = 3), and in 3 patients who underwent VSARR. AV morphology was clearly visualized using the device in all experiments. In human subjects, the use of this device successfully showed cusp prolapse after the initial VSARR and effectively guided additional cusp repair.
conclusionsThis device successfully allows for direct visual assessment of the AV apparatus under physiologic pressure. The use of this device can potentially increase the adoptability of AV repair in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.