Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216968›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology2022

Effect of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy on sex steroid hormone serum levels among postmenopausal women: an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Phuong L Mai, Austin Miller, Amanda Black, Roni T Falk, John F Boggess, Katherine Tucker, Ashley R Stuckey, Gustavo C Rodriguez, Cheung Wong, Thomas T Amatruda and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 16 institutions in 2 countries.

Phuong L MaiCenter for Clinical Genetics and Genomics, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Magee-Womens Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: maip@upmc.edu.
Austin MillerNRG Oncology, Clinical Trial Development Division, Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY.
Amanda BlackDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Roni T FalkDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
John F BoggessDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
Katherine TuckerHereditary Cancer Centre, Nelune Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Department of Medical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital and Community Health Services, Prince of Wales Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Ashley R StuckeyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Women & Infants Hospital, Providence, RI.
Gustavo C RodriguezDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, IL.
Cheung WongDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Vermont Medical Center, Burlington, VT.
Thomas T AmatrudaMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, Fridley Clinic, Fridley, MN.
Kelly J WilkinsonDepartment of Medicine, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS.
Susan C ModesittDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA.
S Diane YamadaDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Kristin L BixelDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH.
Gretchen E GlaserDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
Peter G RoseDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Mark H GreeneDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Mark E ShermanDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL.
National Cancer Institute · USCleveland Clinic · USMagee-Womens Hospital · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · USMetro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium · USNorthShore University HealthSystem · USProvidence College · USRoswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USUniversity of Vermont Medical Center · USUniversity of Virginia · USUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

NRG Oncology Network Group Operations Center - GY9 BIQSFP Reports/BudgetsU10CA180868 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI NORMAN WOLMARK · 2014 to 2026
$206.8M
Statistics CoreU10CA180822 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI James J. Dignam, GREG YOTHERS · 2014 to 2026
$146.4M
NRG Oncology NCORP Research Base-BIQSFPUG1CA189867 · NCI · NRG ONCOLOGY FOUNDATION, INC. · PI Deborah Watkins Bruner, Lisa A. Kachnic · 2014 to 2026
$140.5M
Network Lead Academic Participating Site Grant from the Roswell Park Cancer InstituteUG1CA233191 · NCI · ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE CORP · PI LELE, SHASHIKANT, LEVINE, ELLIS G · 2019 to 2025
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180822NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180868NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189867NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA233191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy is an effective ovarian cancer risk reduction strategy. However, bilateral oophorectomy has also been associated with increased long-term nonneoplastic sequelae, effects suggested to be mediated through reductions in systemic sex steroid hormone levels. Currently, it is unclear whether the postmenopausal ovary contributes to the systemic hormonal milieu or whether postmenopausal ovarian volume or other factors, such as body mass index and age, affect systemic hormone levels.

objectiveWe examined the impact of oophorectomy on sex steroid hormone levels in postmenopausal women. Furthermore, we explored how well ovarian volume measured by transvaginal ultrasound correlated with direct ovarian measures obtained during surgical pathology evaluation and investigated the association between hormone levels and ovarian volumes. STUDY

designPostmenopausal women who underwent risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (180 cases) or ovarian cancer screening (38 controls) enrolled in an international, prospective study of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and risk of ovarian cancer algorithm-based screening among women at increased risk of ovarian cancer (Gynecologic Oncology Group-0199) were included in this analysis. Controls were frequency matched to the cases on age at menopause, age at study entry, and time interval between blood draws. Ovarian volume was calculated using measurements obtained from transvaginal ultrasound in both cases and controls and measurements recorded in surgical pathology reports from cases. Serum hormone levels of testosterone, androstenedione, androstenediol, dihydrotestosterone, androsterone, dehydroepiandrosterone, estrone, estradiol, and sex hormone-binding globulin were measured at baseline and follow-up. Spearman correlation coefficients were used to compare ovarian volumes as measured on transvaginal ultrasound and pathology examinations. Correlations between ovarian volumes by transvaginal ultrasound and measured hormone levels were examined using linear regression models. All models were adjusted for age. Paired t tests were performed to evaluate individual differences in hormone levels before and after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.

resultsOvarian volumes measured by transvaginal ultrasound were only moderately correlated with those reported on pathology reports (Spearman rho [ρ]=0.42). The median time interval between risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy and follow-up for the cases was 13.3 months (range, 6.0-19.3), and the median time interval between baseline and follow-up for the controls was 12.7 months (range, 8.7-13.4). Sex steroid levels decreased with age but were not correlated with transvaginal ultrasound ovarian volume, body mass index, or time since menopause. Estradiol levels were significantly lower after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (percentage change, -61.9 post-risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy vs +15.2 in controls; P=.02), but no significant differences were seen for the other hormones.

conclusionOvarian volumes measured by transvaginal ultrasound were moderately correlated with volumes directly measured on pathology specimens and were not correlated with sex steroid hormone levels in postmenopausal women. Estradiol was the only hormone that declined significantly after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy. Thus, it remains unclear whether the limited post-risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy changes in sex steroid hormones among postmenopausal women impact long-term adverse outcomes.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsSalpingo-oophorectomyEstradiolFemaleGonadal Steroid HormonesHumansPostmenopauseProspective StudiesEstradiolGonadal Steroid Hormonesovarian volumepostmenopausal sex steroid hormonesrisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy

Identifiers

PMID35216968
PMCPMC9253062
OpenAlexW4214773191

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.