Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216832›Full record

ArticleFertility and sterility2022

Route of myomectomy and fertility: a prospective cohort study.

Lauren A Wise, Laine Thomas, Sophia Anderson, Donna D Baird, Raymond M Anchan, Kathryn L Terry, Erica E Marsh, Ganesa Wegienka, Wanda Kay Nicholson, Kedra Wallace and 6 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Fertility and sterility, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02260752 (Comparing Options for Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02260752 completednot on this map

Comparing Options for Management: Patient Centered Results for Uterine Fibroids

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorDuke UniversityRan2015 to 2020Enrolled3,094ConditionsFibroids, UterineArmshysterectomy, Uterine arterial embolization, myomectomy, Medical Therapy, endometrial ablation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical management of uterine fibroids.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren A WiseDepartment of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts. Electronic address: lwise@bu.edu.
Laine ThomasDepartment of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Sophia AndersonDepartment of Biostatistics, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
Donna D BairdEpidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Durham, North Carolina.
Raymond M AnchanDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kathryn L TerryDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Erica E MarshDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Ganesa WegienkaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan.
Wanda Kay NicholsonCenter for Women's Health Research, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, UNC School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Kedra WallaceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, Mississippi.
Robert BigelowDuke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina.
James SpiesDepartment of Radiology, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, D.C.
George L MaxwellDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Women's Health Integrated Research Center, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, Virginia.
Vanessa JacobySchool of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco California.
Evan R MyersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina.
Elizabeth A StewartDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Duke University · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USBoston University · USClinical Research Institute · USHenry Ford Health System · USInova Fairfax Hospital · USMayo Clinic · USNational Institute of Environmental Health Sciences · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Mississippi Medical Center · USUniversity of North Carolina Health Care · US

Funding

COMPARE-UFP50HS023418 · AHRQ · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MYERS, EVAN R. · 2014 to 2019
$20.0M
AHRQ HHS P50 HS023418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess prospectively the association between the myomectomy route and fertility.

designProspective cohort study.

settingThe Comparing Treatments Options for Uterine Fibroids (COMPARE-UF) Study is a multisite national registry of eight clinic centers across the United States. PATIENT(S): Reproductive-aged women undergoing surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids. INTERVENTION(S): Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We used life-table methods to estimate cumulative probabilities and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of pregnancy and live birth by the myomectomy route during 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up (2015-2019). We also conducted 12-month interval-based analyses that used logistic regression to estimate odds ratios and 95% CIs for associations of interest. In all analyses, we used propensity score weighting to adjust for differences across surgical routes. RESULT(S): Among 1,095 women who underwent myomectomy (abdominal = 388, hysteroscopic = 273, and laparoscopic = 434), 202 reported pregnancy and 91 reported live birth during 36 months of follow-up. There was little difference in the 12-month probability of pregnancy or live birth by route of myomectomy overall or among women intending pregnancy. In interval-based analyses, adjusted ORs for pregnancy were 1.28 (95% CI, 0.76-2.14) for hysteroscopic myomectomy and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.76-1.85) for laparoscopic myomectomy compared with abdominal myomectomy. Among women intending pregnancy, adjusted ORs were 1.27 (95% CI, 0.72-2.23) for hysteroscopic myomectomy and 1.26 (95% CI, 0.77-2.04) for laparoscopic myomectomy compared with abdominal myomectomy. Associations were slightly stronger but less precise for live birth. CONCLUSION(S): The probability of conception or live birth did not differ appreciably by the myomectomy route among women observed for 36 months postoperatively. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER: (NCT02260752, clinicaltrials.gov).

Indexed as

LeiomyomaUterine MyomectomyUterine NeoplasmsAdultFemaleFertilityHumansPregnancyProspective StudiesfertilityFibroidsmyomectomypregnancy

Identifiers

PMID35216832
PMCPMC9081130
OpenAlexW4214587974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.