Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216594›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2022

Towards translational research participation for nurses and midwives: a mixed method study.

Gena Lieschke, Michelle Giles, Jean Ball, Se Ok Ohr, Vicki Parker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Gena LieschkeNursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia. Gena.Lieschke@health.nsw.gov.au.
Michelle GilesNursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Jean BallNursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Se Ok OhrNursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.
Vicki ParkerNursing and Midwifery Research Centre, Hunter New England Local Health District, Gate Cottage, James Fletcher Campus, 72 Watt Street, Newcastle, NSW, 2300, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses' and midwives' participation in research has to date been highly variable and dependent on context and culture. A changing landscape that values and endorses research translation requires examination of who is participating in research and how, with an evaluation of current individual and organizational research capacity. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the existing research capacity amongst nurses and midwives in a large Local Health District in New South Wales, Australia to inform the development of a nuanced capacity building programme directed toward building a sustainable embedded research culture.

methodsA sequential mixed methods study design. Phase one, the exploratory phase, involved an online survey of all nurses and midwives (n = 8156) working in metropolitan, rural, and remote health services across the District. The survey measured research activity, skills, intention, value and relevance, organisational support, capability and culture, and research translation. Phase two, the explanatory phase, involved six focus groups with senior nursing and midwifery clinicians, educators, and unit managers, with discussion centred on the results of Phase one.

resultsA total of 721 (88%) nurses and 95 (12%) midwives completed the online survey, 33 senior nurses and midwives attended focus groups. The nature and extent of research participation is variable across sites, individuals and clinical specialties. In many cases, interest and involvement in research is not sustained. Participants identified the need for greater incentives and structural support. Most important was the need for research to have tangible meaning for patients and clinical practice. CONCLUSION / IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Our findings suggest that translational research offers nurses and midwives the opportunity to engage in research in a way that is meaningful to their practice and their aspirations. Greater emphasis is needed on the development and enactment of context specific nursing and midwifery research agendas and implementation research skills.

Indexed as

Capacity buildingEmbeddingMidwiferyMixed-methodsNursingTranslational research

Identifiers

PMID35216594
PMCPMC8876089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.