Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216432›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

3D Printed Poly(𝜀-caprolactone)/Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: A Comparative Study on a Composite Preparation by Melt Blending or Solvent Casting Techniques and the Influence of Bioceramic Content on Scaffold Properties.

Sara Biscaia, Mariana V Branquinho, Rui D Alvites, Rita Fonseca, Ana Catarina Sousa, Sílvia Santos Pedrosa, Ana R Caseiro, Fernando Guedes, Tatiana Patrício, Tânia Viana and 3 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Recent Advances in Scaffolds for Guided Bone Regeneration.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sara BiscaiaCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2609-6878
Mariana V BranquinhoVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1328-464X
Rui D AlvitesVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1945-6377
Rita FonsecaCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.
Ana Catarina SousaVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Sílvia Santos PedrosaVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-2055-8031
Ana R CaseiroVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Fernando GuedesVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.
Tatiana PatrícioCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-0672-9014
Tânia VianaCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.
Artur MateusCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.
Ana C MaurícioVeterinary Clinics Department, Abel Salazar Biomedical Sciences Institute (ICBAS), University of Porto (UP), Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, n 228, 4050-313 Porto, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-0018-9363
Nuno AlvesCentre for Rapid and Sustainable Product Development (CDRSP), Polytechnic Institute of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-5016-0868

Funding

Agencia de Inovacao POCI-01-0247-FEDER-017771Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PAMI - ROTEIRO/0328/2013 (Nº 022158)Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia PEst-OE/AGR/UI0211/2011Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/116118/2016Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/146172/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia SFRH/BD/146689/2019Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDB/04044/2020Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia UIDP/04044/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone tissue engineering has been developed in the past decades, with the engineering of bone substitutes on the vanguard of this regenerative approach. Polycaprolactone-based scaffolds are fairly applied for bone regeneration, and several composites have been incorporated so as to improve the scaffolds' mechanical properties and tissue in-growth. In this study, hydroxyapatite is incorporated on polycaprolactone-based scaffolds at two different proportions, 80:20 and 60:40. Scaffolds are produced with two different blending methods, solvent casting and melt blending. The prepared composites are 3D printed through an extrusion-based technique and further investigated with regard to their chemical, thermal, morphological, and mechanical characteristics. In vitro cytocompatibility and osteogenic differentiation was also assessed with human dental pulp stem/stromal cells. The results show the melt-blending-derived scaffolds to present more promising mechanical properties, along with the incorporation of hydroxyapatite. The latter is also related to an increase in osteogenic activity and promotion. Overall, this study suggests polycaprolactone/hydroxyapatite scaffolds to be promising candidates for bone tissue engineering, particularly when produced by the MB method.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsBone and BonesBone RegenerationBone SubstitutesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDurapatiteHumansMaterials TestingOsteogenesisPolyestersPorosityPrinting, Three-DimensionalSolventsTissue EngineeringTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible MaterialsBone SubstitutesDurapatitepolycaprolactonePolyestersSolvents3D printingbone tissue engineeringcompositescytocompatibilityhydroxyapatitemelt blendingpolycaprolactonesolvent casting

Identifiers

PMID35216432
PMCPMC8880322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.