Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216331›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

An Efficient

Shuang-Shuang Wen, Xiao-Lan Ge, Rui Wang, Hai-Feng Yang, Yu-E Bai, Ying-Hua Guo, Jin Zhang, Meng-Zhu Lu, Shu-Tang Zhao, Liu-Qiang Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Dual function ofForestry research · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Transcription FactorInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  19. Engineering Crassulacean Acid Metabolism in CCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024
    Review
  20. Simplified Method forMethods and protocols · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Shuang-Shuang WenState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Xiao-Lan GeState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Rui WangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Hai-Feng YangCollege of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Yu-E BaiCollege of Forestry, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010019, China.
Ying-Hua GuoState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Jin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, College of Forestry and Biotechnology, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou 311300, China.
Meng-Zhu LuState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Shu-Tang ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.
Liu-Qiang WangState Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of the State Forestry Administration, Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry, Beijing 100091, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2157-1729

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2021YFD2200205National Natural Science Foundation of China 31971620
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A highly efficient

Indexed as

AcetophenonesAgrobacterium tumefaciensGenetic VectorsPlant LeavesPlants, Genetically ModifiedPopulusReproducibility of ResultsTransformation, GeneticAcetophenonesacetosyringoneAgrobacteriumcallushybrid poplarplant transformationregeneration

Identifiers

PMID35216331
PMCPMC8879841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.