Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216302›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Metagenomic Sequencing for Microbial DNA in Human Samples: Emerging Technological Advances.

Yu Shi, Guoping Wang, Harry Cheuk-Hay Lau, Jun Yu

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 102 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
102citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

102 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Rapid Metagenomic Detection ofVeterinary sciences · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

42 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Yu ShiInstitute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Guoping WangInstitute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-2635-6932
Harry Cheuk-Hay LauInstitute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3581-2909
Jun YuInstitute of Digestive Disease, Department of Medicine and Therapeutics, State Key Laboratory of Digestive Disease, Li Ka Shing Institute of Health Sciences, CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5008-2153
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

Chinese University of Hong Kong Vice-Chancellor's Discretionary FundNational Key R&D Program of China 2020YFA0509200/2020YFA0509203RGC Collaborative Research Fund C4039-19GF, C7065-18GFRGC-GRF Hong Kong 14163817RGC Theme-based Res Scheme Hong Kong T21-705/20-N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whole genome metagenomic sequencing is a powerful platform enabling the simultaneous identification of all genes from entirely different kingdoms of organisms in a complex sample. This technology has revolutionised multiple areas from microbiome research to clinical diagnoses. However, one of the major challenges of a metagenomic study is the overwhelming non-microbial DNA present in most of the host-derived specimens, which can inundate the microbial signals and reduce the sensitivity of microorganism detection. Various host DNA depletion methods to facilitate metagenomic sequencing have been developed and have received considerable attention in this context. In this review, we present an overview of current host DNA depletion approaches along with explanations of their underlying principles, advantages and disadvantages. We also discuss their applications in laboratory microbiome research and clinical diagnoses and, finally, we envisage the direction of the further perfection of metagenomic sequencing in samples with overabundant host DNA.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMetagenomicsDNAHumansMetagenomeSequence Analysis, DNATechnologyDNAclinical metagenomicshigh throughput sequencinghost DNA depletionhuman microbiome

Identifiers

PMID35216302
PMCPMC8877284
OpenAlexW4212863351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.