Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216098›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

Genome-Wide Expression and Anti-Proliferative Effects of Electric Field Therapy on Pediatric and Adult Brain Tumors.

Joshua Branter, Maria Estevez-Cebrero, Mohammed Diksin, Michaela Griffin, Marcos Castellanos-Uribe, Sean May, Ruman Rahman, Richard Grundy, Surajit Basu, Stuart Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Neuromodulation in Neuro-Oncology: A Scoping Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Neuromodulation for Brain Tumors: Myth or Reality? A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Joshua BranterChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Maria Estevez-CebreroChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Mohammed DiksinChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Michaela GriffinChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Marcos Castellanos-UribeNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.
Sean MayNottingham Arabidopsis Stock Centre, Division of Plant and Crop Sciences, School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Loughborough LE12 5RD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5282-3250
Ruman RahmanChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6541-9983
Richard GrundyChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2585-2539
Surajit BasuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.
Stuart SmithChildren's Brain Tumour Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4556-2707

Funding

Children's Cancer and Leukaemia Group CCLGA201916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The lack of treatment options for high-grade brain tumors has led to searches for alternative therapeutic modalities. Electrical field therapy is one such area. The Optune™ system is an FDA-approved novel device that delivers continuous alternating electric fields (tumor treating fields-TTFields) to the patient for the treatment of primary and recurrent Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Various mechanisms have been proposed to explain the effects of TTFields and other electrical therapies. Here, we present the first study of genome-wide expression of electrotherapy (delivered via TTFields or Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)) on brain tumor cell lines. The effects of electric fields were assessed through gene expression arrays and combinational effects with chemotherapies. We observed that both DBS and TTFields significantly affected brain tumor cell line viability, with DBS promoting G0-phase accumulation and TTFields promoting G2-phase accumulation. Both treatments may be used to augment the efficacy of chemotherapy in vitro. Genome-wide expression assessment demonstrated significant overlap between the different electrical treatments, suggesting novel interactions with mitochondrial functioning and promoting endoplasmic reticulum stress. We demonstrate the in vitro efficacy of electric fields against adult and pediatric high-grade brain tumors and elucidate potential mechanisms of action for future study.

Indexed as

BrainBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalChildCombined Modality TherapyElectric Stimulation TherapyEndoplasmic Reticulum StressG2 PhaseGlioblastomaHumansMitochondriaResting Phase, Cell CycleDeep Brain Stimulationependymomagliomatumor treating fields

Identifiers

PMID35216098
PMCPMC8880247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.