Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35216052›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of molecular sciences2022

A Novel Xeno-Free Method to Isolate Human Endometrial Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (E-MSCs) in Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) Conditions.

Stefano Canosa, Katia Mareschi, Elena Marini, Andrea Roberto Carosso, Sara Castiglia, Deborah Rustichelli, Ivana Ferrero, Gianluca Gennarelli, Benedetta Bussolati, Alberto Nocifora and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of molecular sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Stefano CanosaGynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6402-6750
Katia MareschiDepartment of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2889-0394
Elena MariniDepartment of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Andrea Roberto CarossoGynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7734-4499
Sara CastigliaStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Paediatric Onco-Haematology Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, City of Health and Science of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Deborah RustichelliStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Paediatric Onco-Haematology Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, City of Health and Science of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Ivana FerreroStem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Laboratory, Paediatric Onco-Haematology Division, Regina Margherita Children's Hospital, City of Health and Science of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Gianluca GennarelliGynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4390-9428
Benedetta BussolatiMolecular Biotechnology Centre, Department of Molecular Biotechnology and Health Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3663-5134
Alberto NociforaDepartment of Oncology, Pathology Unit, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Valentina AsnaghiDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Medical Genetics Division, City of Health and Science of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy.
Massimiliano BergalloDepartment of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Ciro IsidoroDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Piemonte Orientale, 13100 Novara, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5494-3034
Chiara BenedettoGynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.
Alberto RevelliGynecology and Obstetrics 1U, Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5797-3722
Franca FagioliDepartment of Public Health and Paediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9257-900X
University of Turin · ITPiedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITOspedale Regina Margherita · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

Ministry of Education, Universities and Research MARK_RILO_18_02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cyclic regeneration of human endometrium is guaranteed by the proliferative capacity of endometrial mesenchymal stromal cells (E-MSCs). Due to this, the autologous infusion of E-MSCs has been proposed to support endometrial growth in a wide range of gynecological diseases. We aimed to compare two different endometrial sampling methods, surgical curettage and vacuum aspiration biopsy random assay (VABRA), and to validate a novel xeno-free method to culture human E-MSCs. Six E-MSCs cell samples were isolated after mechanical tissue homogenization and cultured using human platelet lysate. E-MSCs were characterized for the colony formation capacity, proliferative potential, and multilineage differentiation. The expression of mesenchymal and stemness markers were tested by FACS analysis and real-time PCR, respectively. Chromosomal alterations were evaluated by karyotype analysis, whereas tumorigenic capacity and invasiveness were tested by soft agar assay. Both endometrial sampling techniques allowed efficient isolation and expansion of E-MSCs using a xeno-free method, preserving their mesenchymal and stemness phenotype, proliferative potential, and limited multi-lineage differentiation ability during the culture. No chromosomal alterations and invasive/tumorigenic capacity were observed. Herein, we report the first evidence of efficient E-MSCs isolation and culture in Good Manufacturing Practice compliance conditions, suggesting VABRA endometrial sampling as alternative to surgical curettage.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkersBone Marrow CellsCell Culture TechniquesCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedEndometriumFemaleHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsYoung AdultBiomarkersAsherman’s syndromeendometrial mesenchymal stromal cellsendometrial samplingendometrial thicknessGood Manufacturing Practice (GMP)human platelet lysate (HPL)infertility

Identifiers

PMID35216052
PMCPMC8876308
OpenAlexW4211108958

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.