Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35215819›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Time-Dependent Proinflammatory Responses Shape Virus Interference during Coinfections of Influenza A Virus and Influenza D Virus.

Minhui Guan, Sherry Blackmon, Alicia K Olivier, Xiaojian Zhang, Liyuan Liu, Amelia Woolums, Mark A Crenshaw, Shengfa F Liao, Richard Webby, William Epperson and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Minhui GuanMU Center for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Sherry BlackmonDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Alicia K OlivierDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Xiaojian ZhangMU Center for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Liyuan LiuDepartment of Basic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Amelia WoolumsDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Mark A CrenshawDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Shengfa F LiaoDepartment of Animal and Dairy Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Richard WebbyDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4397-7132
William EppersonDepartment of Pathobiology and Population Medicine, College of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville, MS 39762, USA.
Xiu-Feng WanMU Center for Influenza and Emerging Infectious Diseases, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA.
Mississippi State University · USUniversity of Missouri · USSt. Jude Children's Research Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both influenza A virus (IAV) and influenza D virus (IDV) are enzootic in pigs. IAV causes approximately 100% morbidity with low mortality, whereas IDV leads to only mild respiratory diseases in pigs. In this study, we performed a series of coinfection experiments in vitro and in vivo to understand how IAV and IDV interact and cause pathogenesis during coinfection. The results showed that IAV inhibited IDV replication when infecting swine tracheal epithelial cells (STECs) with IAV 24 or 48 h prior to IDV inoculation and that IDV suppressed IAV replication when IDV preceded IAV inoculation by 48 h. Virus interference was not identified during simultaneous IAV/IDV infections or with 6 h between the two viral infections, regardless of their order. The interference pattern at 24 and 48 h correlated with proinflammatory responses induced by the first infection, which, for IDV, was slower than for IAV by about 24 h. The viruses did not interfere with each other if both infected the cells before proinflammatory responses were induced. Coinfection in pigs further demonstrated that IAV interfered with both viral shedding and virus replication of IDV, especially in the upper respiratory tract. Clinically, coinfection of IDV and IAV did not show significant enhancement of disease pathogenesis, compared with the pigs infected with IAV alone. In summary, this study suggests that interference during coinfection of IAV and IDV is primarily due to the proinflammatory response; therefore, it is dependent on the time between infections and the order of infection. This study facilitates our understanding of virus epidemiology and pathogenesis associated with IAV and IDV coinfection.

Indexed as

Viral InterferenceAnimalsCoinfectionInfluenza A virusOrthomyxoviridae InfectionsSwineSwine DiseasesThogotovirusTime FactorsVirus Replicationco-infectioninfluenza A virusinfluenza D virusproinflammatory responseswineviral interference

Identifiers

PMID35215819
PMCPMC8878573
OpenAlexW4220890722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.