Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35215772›Full record

ArticleViruses2022

Distinct Outcomes in COVID-19 Patients with Positive or Negative RT-PCR Test.

Maria Clara Saad Menezes, Diego Vinicius Santinelli Pestana, Juliana Carvalho Ferreira, Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de Carvalho, Marcelo Consorti Felix, Izabel Oliva Marcilio, Katia Regina da Silva, Vilson Cobello Junior, Julio Flavio Marchini, Julio Cesar Alencar and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Maria Clara Saad MenezesEmergency Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3314-8127
Diego Vinicius Santinelli PestanaEmergency Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2226-2816
Juliana Carvalho FerreiraHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6548-1384
Carlos Roberto Ribeiro de CarvalhoHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.
Marcelo Consorti FelixHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.
Izabel Oliva MarcilioHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.
Katia Regina da SilvaHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5723-8285
Vilson Cobello JuniorHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6322-5229
Julio Flavio MarchiniHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-1945
Julio Cesar AlencarHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5859-6060
Luz Marina Gomez GomezEmergency Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Denis Deratani MauáInstitute of Mathematics and Statistics, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 05508-090, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-2297-6349
Heraldo Possolo SouzaEmergency Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Emergency Usp Covid-GroupEmergency Medicine Department, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903, Brazil.
Hcfmusp Covid-Study GroupHospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo 01246-903l, Brazil.

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation #2020/04.738-8 and #2016/14.566-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Identification of the SARS-CoV-2 virus by RT-PCR from a nasopharyngeal swab sample is a common test for diagnosing COVID-19. However, some patients present clinical, laboratorial, and radiological evidence of COVID-19 infection with negative RT-PCR result(s). Thus, we assessed whether positive results were associated with intubation and mortality. This study was conducted in a Brazilian tertiary hospital from March to August of 2020. All patients had clinical, laboratory, and radiological diagnosis of COVID-19. They were divided into two groups: positive (+) RT-PCR group, with 2292 participants, and negative (-) RT-PCR group, with 706 participants. Patients with negative RT-PCR testing and an alternative most probable diagnosis were excluded from the study. The RT-PCR(+) group presented increased risk of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, length of hospital stay, and 28-day mortality, when compared to the RT-PCR(-) group. A positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR result was independently associated with intubation and 28 day in-hospital mortality. Accordingly, we concluded that patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis based on clinical data, despite a negative RT-PCR test from nasopharyngeal samples, presented more favorable outcomes than patients with positive RT-PCR test(s).

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersAgedBrazilCOVID-19COVID-19 Nucleic Acid TestingFemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNasopharynxRetrospective StudiesReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRisk FactorsCOVID-19COVID-19 testinghospital mortalityintubationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35215772
PMCPMC8874612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.