ArticlePharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)2022
UHPLC-MS/MS Analysis of Antibiotics Transfer and Concentrations in Porcine Oral Fluid after Intramuscular Application.
Article in Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determination of tylosin concentration in sow's milk after intramuscular administration.Journal of veterinary research · 2025Article
- Associations between health, productive performance and oral fluid biomarkers in commercial pig farms.Porcine health management · 2024Article
- A Preliminary Study on the Concentration of Oxytetracycline and 4-Epi-Oxytetracycline in Sow Milk.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The monitoring of antibiotic use in animals is a crucial element to ensure food safety. The main goal of this study was to analyse the distribution of selected antibiotics to porcine oral fluid, as well as to demonstrate that an oral fluid is an alternative to other biological matrices used in the control of antibacterials. Therefore, an animal study with pigs treated using seven different antibiotics was performed. Sulfadoxine (SDX) with trimethoprim (TRMP), lincomycin (LIN), tiamulin (TIAM), tylosin (TYL), amoxicillin (AMX) and penicillin G (PEN G) were injected intramuscularly to pigs, and concentrations of these analytes in the oral fluid were assessed. Ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) was used to quantify the analytes. On the first day of medication, the highest concentrations for SDX and TRMP at the level of 22,300 µg/kg and 14,100 µg/kg were found, respectively. The concentrations of LIN (10,500 µg/kg) and TIAM (7600 µg/kg) were also relatively high. The peak of TYL was recorded on the second day of drug administration. Most of the analytes were present in oral fluid for 30 days, apart from TYL, which was detected for 27 days. It was found that AMX and PEN G were quantified only for 5 and 8 days, respectively, at very low concentrations. It was found that oral fluid can be used for the verification of antibiotics on pig farms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.