ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Comparison of Infectious Disease Forecasting Methods across Locations, Diseases, and Time.
Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Environmental and epidemiological drivers of dengue forecasting across heterogeneous transmission settings in Brazil and Panama.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Machine learning and probabilistic approaches for forecasting infectious disease transmission and cases.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026Article
- Biosurveillance and early outbreak detection of rabies in settings with limited laboratory capacity using spatiotemporal clustering and a machine learning framework.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Probabilistic forecasting of under-five mortality in Uganda: implications for monitoring SDG 3.2.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- A systems approach for anticipating post-pandemic forecast challenges for pediatric influenza and hospital burden.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A machine learning model and molecular clusters of epigenetic chromatin regulators in tuberculosis based on bioinformatics and clinical samples.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Meeting Global Health Needs via Infectious Disease Forecasting: Development of a Reliable Data-Driven Framework.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2025Article
- Prediction analysis of human brucellosis cases in Ili Kazakh Autonomous Prefecture Xinjiang China based on time series.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Forecasting the Monkeypox Outbreak Using Limited Data: A Case Study of Thailand.Interdisciplinary perspectives on infectious diseases · 2025Article
- Machine learning to improve the understanding of rabies epidemiology in low surveillance settings.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Enhancing infectious disease prediction model selection with multi-objective optimization: an empirical study.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- Predicting Kyasanur forest disease in resource-limited settings using event-based surveillance and transfer learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Predicting infectious disease for biopreparedness and response: A systematic review of machine learning and deep learning approaches.One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accurate infectious disease forecasting can inform efforts to prevent outbreaks and mitigate adverse impacts. This study compares the performance of statistical, machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) approaches in forecasting infectious disease incidences across different countries and time intervals. We forecasted three diverse diseases: campylobacteriosis, typhoid, and Q-fever, using a wide variety of features (n = 46) from public datasets, e.g., landscape, climate, and socioeconomic factors. We compared autoregressive statistical models to two tree-based ML models (extreme gradient boosted trees [XGB] and random forest [RF]) and two DL models (multi-layer perceptron and encoder-decoder model). The disease models were trained on data from seven different countries at the region-level between 2009-2017. Forecasting performance of all models was assessed using mean absolute error, root mean square error, and Poisson deviance across Australia, Israel, and the United States for the months of January through August of 2018. The overall model results were compared across diseases as well as various data splits, including country, regions with highest and lowest cases, and the forecasted months out (i.e., nowcasting, short-term, and long-term forecasting). Overall, the XGB models performed the best for all diseases and, in general, tree-based ML models performed the best when looking at data splits. There were a few instances where the statistical or DL models had minutely smaller error metrics for specific subsets of typhoid, which is a disease with very low case counts. Feature importance per disease was measured by using four tree-based ML models (i.e., XGB and RF with and without region name as a feature). The most important feature groups included previous case counts, region name, population counts and density, mortality causes of neonatal to under 5 years of age, sanitation factors, and elevation. This study demonstrates the power of ML approaches to incorporate a wide range of factors to forecast various diseases, regardless of location, more accurately than traditional statistical approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.