Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35215081›Full record

ArticlePathogens (Basel, Switzerland)2022

African Swine Fever Survey in a European Context.

Ana de la Torre, Jaime Bosch, José Manuel Sánchez-Vizcaíno, Satoshi Ito, Carolina Muñoz, Irene Iglesias, Marta Martínez-Avilés

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Odor Fences Have No Effect on Wild Boar Movement and Home Range Size.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. African Swine Fever and Its Control Measures in Wild Boar: AAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Has the Spread of African Swine Fever in the European Union Been Impacted by COVID-19 Pandemic?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ana de la TorreInfectious Diseases and Global Health Department, Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (INIA-CSIC), 28130 Madrid, Spain.
Jaime BoschAnimal Health Department, Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
José Manuel Sánchez-VizcaínoAnimal Health Department, Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Satoshi ItoAnimal Health Department, Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Carolina MuñozAnimal Health Department, Centro de Vigilancia Sanitaria Veterinaria (VISAVET), Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0017-8234
Irene IglesiasInfectious Diseases and Global Health Department, Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (INIA-CSIC), 28130 Madrid, Spain.
Marta Martínez-AvilésInfectious Diseases and Global Health Department, Centro de Investigación en Sanidad Animal (CISA), Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria-Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (INIA-CSIC), 28130 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7880-3829
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ES

Funding

European Union 862874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

African swine fever (ASF) is currently the most threatening disease for domestic and wild pigs worldwide. Wild boar has been the main affected species in all EU countries except for Romania, where most notifications occur in domestic pigs. The spread of ASF in wild boar is challenging to control; risk factors are harder to identify and establish than in domestic pigs, which, together with an underestimation of the disease and the lack of treatment or an effective vaccine, are hindering control and eradication efforts. We distributed two online questionnaires, one for domestic pigs and one for wild boar, to experts of different background and countries in Europe, to explore risk factors in relation to ASF control connected to farming, hunting, trade, the environment, and domestic pig and wild boar populations. Overall, wild boar movements were estimated to pose the highest risk of ASF introduction and spread. The movement of pork and pork products for own consumption also ranked high. Here we explored, in addition to the assessment of risk pathways, the identification of risks of transmission at the domestic/wild boar interface, the importance of biosecurity practices and improved control efforts, and controversial opinions that require further attention.

Indexed as

epidemiologyexpert opinionpigsquestionnairestakeholderswild boar

Identifiers

PMID35215081
PMCPMC8878522
OpenAlexW4207002103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.