Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35215053›Full record

ArticleNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Determination of the Transport Efficiency in spICP-MS Analysis Using Conventional Sample Introduction Systems: An Interlaboratory Comparison Study.

Otmar Geiss, Ivana Bianchi, Guillaume Bucher, Eveline Verleysen, Frédéric Brassinne, Jan Mast, Katrin Loeschner, Lucas Givelet, Francesco Cubadda, Francesca Ferraris and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Otmar GeissEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5371-3798
Ivana BianchiEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7954-7532
Guillaume BucherService Commun des Laboratoires (SCL), 33608 Pessac, France.
Eveline VerleysenSciensano, Trace Elements and Nanomaterials, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.
Frédéric BrassinneSciensano, Trace Elements and Nanomaterials, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.
Jan MastSciensano, Trace Elements and Nanomaterials, 1180 Brussels, Belgium.
Katrin LoeschnerDivision for Food Technology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0003-1741-8406
Lucas GiveletDivision for Food Technology, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-5274-9772
Francesco CubaddaIstituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3454-7947
Francesca FerrarisIstituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Andrea RaggiIstituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.
Francesca IacoponiIstituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), National Institute of Health, 00161 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6298-0700
Ruud PetersWageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Business Unit Contaminants & Toxicology, 6708 Wageningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3948-5012
Anna UndasWageningen Food Safety Research, Part of Wageningen University & Research, Business Unit Contaminants & Toxicology, 6708 Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Alexandra MüllerMax Rubner-Institut (MRI), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Ann-Katrin MeinhardtMax Rubner-Institut (MRI), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Birgit HetzerMax Rubner-Institut (MRI), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8471-5748
Volker GräfMax Rubner-Institut (MRI), Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food, Department of Food Technology and Bioprocess Engineering, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0739-3196
Antonio R Montoro BustosNational Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD 20899, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5945-2333
Josefa Barrero-MorenoEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), 21027 Ispra, Italy.
Istituto Superiore di Sanità · ITMax Rubner Institut · DEJoint Research Centre · ITSciensano (Belgium) · BETechnical University of Denmark · DKWageningen University & Research · NLNational Institute of Standards and Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In single particle inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (spICP-MS), the transport efficiency is fundamental for the correct determination of both particle number concentration and size. In the present study, transport efficiency was systematically determined on three different days with six carefully characterised gold nanoparticle (AuNP) suspensions and in seven European and US expert laboratories using different ICP-MS instruments and spICP-MS software. Both particle size-(TES)-and particle frequency-(TEF)-methods were applied. The resulting transport efficiencies did not deviate much under ideal conditions. The TEF method however systematically resulted in lower transport efficiencies. The extent of this difference (0-300% rel. difference) depended largely on the choice and storage conditions of the nanoparticle suspensions used for the determination. The TES method is recommended when the principal measurement objective is particle size. If the main aim of the measurement is the determination of the particle number concentration, the TEF approach could be preferred as it might better account for particle losses in the sample introduction system.

Indexed as

gold nanoparticlessingle particle ICP-MStransport efficiency

Identifiers

PMID35215053
PMCPMC8875013
OpenAlexW4213126116

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.