Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214825›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Understanding the

Akula Nookaraju, Shashank K Pandey, Yogesh K Ahlawat, Chandrashekhar P Joshi

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Akula NookarajuDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.
Shashank K PandeyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0787-3125
Yogesh K AhlawatDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0189-6972
Chandrashekhar P JoshiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Michigan Technological University, Houghton, MI 49931, USA.
Michigan Technological University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lignocellulosic biomass from the secondary cell walls of plants has a veritable potential to provide some of the most appropriate raw materials for producing second-generation biofuels. Therefore, we must first understand how plants synthesize these complex secondary cell walls that consist of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin in order to deconstruct them later on into simple sugars to produce bioethanol via fermentation.

Indexed as

bioethanolKNOX II transcription factorssaccharificationsecondary cell wallsxylanxylem and fiber development

Identifiers

PMID35214825
PMCPMC8880547
OpenAlexW4213065694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.