Protective Efficacy of Novel Oral Biofilm Vaccines against

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Fatal Hemorrhagic Septicemia in Common Guitarfish (Rhinobatos rhinobatos) Caused by Photobacterium damselae Subsp. damselae in a Controlled Environment.Journal of fish diseases · 2026
   Article
2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
   Review
3. An Introduction to Relevant Immunology Principles with Respect to Oral Vaccines in Aquaculture.Microorganisms · 2023
   Review
4. Evaluation of feed utilization, immune response and disease resistance in striped catfish,Fish and shellfish immunology reports · 2022
   Article
5. Editorial of Special Issue "The 2nd Edition: Vaccines for Aquaculture".Vaccines · 2022
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

Abstract

Indexed as