Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214620›Full record

ArticleVaccines2022

Vaccine Hesitancy and Anti-Vaccination Attitudes during the Start of COVID-19 Vaccination Program: A Content Analysis on Twitter Data.

Hüseyin Küçükali, Ömer Ataç, Ayşe Seval Palteki, Ayşe Zülal Tokaç, Osman Hayran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Social Perception, Trust, and Reluctance Towards Vaccines: A Bibliometric Analysis (2019-2025).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Scrutinizing the COVID-19 vaccine safety debate.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Art and Agency in the Era of De-Structuration: Exploring a New Field.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hüseyin KüçükaliDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34815, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-1669-3107
Ömer AtaçDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34815, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8984-9673
Ayşe Seval PaltekiDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34815, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-7000
Ayşe Zülal TokaçDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34815, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9235-5647
Osman HayranDepartment of Public Health, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul 34815, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-9994-5033

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Twitter is a useful source for detecting anti-vaccine content due to the increasing prevalence of these arguments on social media. We aimed to identify the prominent themes about vaccine hesitancy and refusal on social media posts in Turkish during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this qualitative study, we collected public tweets (

Indexed as

content analysisCOVID-19social mediaTwittervaccine hesitancyvaccines

Identifiers

PMID35214620
PMCPMC8876163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.