ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Real-Time Foot Tracking and Gait Evaluation with Geometric Modeling.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Comprehensive Review of Vision-Based Sensor Systems for Human Gait Analysis.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Gait monitoring for older adults during guided walking: An integrated assistive robot and wearable sensor approach.Wearable technologies · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gait evaluation is important in gait rehabilitation and assistance to monitor patient's balance status and assess recovery performance. Recent technologies leverage on vision-based systems with high portability and low operational complexity. In this paper, we propose a new vision-based foot tracking algorithm specially catering to overground gait assistive devices, which often have limited view of the users. The algorithm models the foot and the shank of the user using simple geometry. Through cost optimization, it then aligns the models to the point cloud, showing the back view of the user's lower limbs. The system outputs the poses of the feet, which are used to compute the spatial-temporal gait parameters. Seven healthy young subjects are recruited to perform overground and treadmill walking trials. The results of the algorithm are compared with the motion capture system and a third-party gait analysis software. The algorithm has a fitting rotational and translational errors of less than 20 degrees and 33 mm, respectively, for 0.4 m/s walking speed. The gait detection F1 score achieves more than 96.8%. The step length and step width errors are around 35 mm, while the cycle time error is less than 38 ms. The proposed algorithm provides a fast, contactless, portable, and cost-effective gait evaluation method without requiring the user to wear any customized footwear.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.