Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214561›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

ECG Recurrence Plot-Based Arrhythmia Classification Using Two-Dimensional Deep Residual CNN Features.

Bhekumuzi M Mathunjwa, Yin-Tsong Lin, Chien-Hung Lin, Maysam F Abbod, Muammar Sadrawi, Jiann-Shing Shieh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Deep learning-based lightweight model for automated lumbar foraminal stenosis classification: sagittal CT diagnostic performance compared to clinical subspecialists.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Bhekumuzi M MathunjwaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan.
Yin-Tsong LinAI R&D Department, New Era AI Robotic Inc., Taipei 10571, Taiwan.
Chien-Hung LinAI R&D Department, New Era AI Robotic Inc., Taipei 10571, Taiwan.
Maysam F AbbodDepartment of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Brunel University London, London UB8 3PH, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8515-7933
Muammar SadrawiDepartment of Bioinformatics, School of Life Sciences, Indonesia International Institute for Life Sciences, Jl. Pulomas Barat Kav 88, Jakarta 13210, Indonesia.
Jiann-Shing ShiehDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan 32003, Taiwan.

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology MOST 110-2221-E-155-004-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this paper, an effective electrocardiogram (ECG) recurrence plot (RP)-based arrhythmia classification algorithm that can be implemented in portable devices is presented. Public databases from PhysioNet were used to conduct this study including the MIT-BIH Atrial Fibrillation Database, the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia Database, the MIT-BIH Malignant Ventricular Ectopy Database, and the Creighton University Ventricular Tachyarrhythmia Database. ECG time series were segmented and converted using an RP, and two-dimensional images were used as inputs to the CNN classifiers. In this study, two-stage classification is proposed to improve the accuracy. The ResNet-18 architecture was applied to detect ventricular fibrillation (VF) and noise during the first stage, whereas normal, atrial fibrillation, premature atrial contraction, and premature ventricular contractions were detected using ResNet-50 in the second stage. The method was evaluated using 5-fold cross-validation which improved the results when compared to previous studies, achieving first and second stage average accuracies of 97.21% and 98.36%, sensitivities of 96.49% and 97.92%, positive predictive values of 95.54% and 98.20%, and F1-scores of 95.96% and 98.05%, respectively. Furthermore, a 5-fold improvement in the memory requirement was achieved when compared with a previous study, making this classifier feasible for use in resource-constricted environments such as portable devices. Even though the method is successful, first stage training requires combining four different arrhythmia types into one label (other), which generates more data for the other category than for VF and noise, thus creating a data imbalance that affects the first stage performance.

Indexed as

Tachycardia, VentricularVentricular Premature ComplexesAlgorithmsElectrocardiographyHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVentricular Fibrillationarrhythmiadeep residual convolutional neural networkelectrocardiogramrecurrence plot

Identifiers

PMID35214561
PMCPMC8877903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.