Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214503›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Discussion of the Influence of Multiscale PCA Denoising Methods with Three Different Features.

Chizhou Zhang, Tao Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chizhou ZhangElectronic & Computer Science School, University of Shouthampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
Tao SunElectronic Information School, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China.
University of Roehampton · GBWuhan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioinformation is information generated from biological movement. By using a variety of modern technologies, we can use this information to form a meaningful model for researchers to study. An electromyographic (EMG) signal is one type of bioinformation that is used in many areas to help people study human muscle movement. This information can help in both clinical areas and industrial areas. EMG is a very complicated signal, so processing it is vital. The processing of EMG signals is divided into collection, denoising, decomposition, feature extraction and classification steps. In this article, the wavelet denoising step and several decomposition processes are discussed to show the usage of this technique in the final classification step. At the end of the study, we find that after the wavelet denoising step, the classification accuracy, which uses the K-nearest neighbor of the independent component analysis features, improves, but the accuracy of the wavelet coefficient features and autoregression coefficient features decreases.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedCluster AnalysisData CollectionHumansWavelet AnalysisEMG signalICAKNNsignal decompositionwavelet function

Identifiers

PMID35214503
PMCPMC8879559
OpenAlexW4213303607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.