ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
The Challenge of Data Annotation in Deep Learning-A Case Study on Whole Plant Corn Silage.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Frost damage segmentation in grapevine organs using YOLOv11s with ASPP and dynamic confidence thresholding.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Source camera attribution using a rule-based explainable convolutional neural network.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Breaking the barrier of human-annotated training data for machine learning-aided plant research using aerial imagery.Plant physiology · 2025Article
- Coffee Leaf Rust Disease Detection and Implementation of an Edge Device for Pruning Infected Leaves via Deep Learning Algorithms.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Computer-Simulated Virtual Image Datasets to Train Machine Learning Models for Non-Invasive Fish Detection in Recirculating Aquaculture.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diagnosis of Citrus Greening Using Artificial Intelligence: A Faster Region-Based Convolutional Neural Network Approach with Convolution Block Attention Module-Integrated VGGNet and ResNet Models.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Drone-Based Digital Phenotyping to Evaluating Relative Maturity, Stand Count, and Plant Height in Dry Beans (Plant phenomics (Washington, D.C.) · 2024Article
- Skin Lesion Classification and Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A Comprehensive Review of Recent Advances in Artificial Intelligence for Dentistry E-Health.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Detection of abnormal extraocular muscles in small datasets of computed tomography images using a three-dimensional variational autoencoder.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent advances in computer vision are primarily driven by the usage of deep learning, which is known to require large amounts of data, and creating datasets for this purpose is not a trivial task. Larger benchmark datasets often have detailed processes with multiple stages and users with different roles during annotation. However, this can be difficult to implement in smaller projects where resources can be limited. Therefore, in this work we present our processes for creating an image dataset for kernel fragmentation and stover overlengths in Whole Plant Corn Silage. This includes the guidelines for annotating object instances in respective classes and statistics of gathered annotations. Given the challenging image conditions, where objects are present in large amounts of occlusion and clutter, the datasets appear appropriate for training models. However, we experience annotator inconsistency, which can hamper evaluation. Based on this we argue the importance of having an evaluation form independent of the manual annotation where we evaluate our models with physically based sieving metrics. Additionally, instead of the traditional time-consuming manual annotation approach, we evaluate Semi-Supervised Learning as an alternative, showing competitive results while requiring fewer annotations. Specifically, given a relatively large supervised set of around 1400 images we can improve the Average Precision by a number of percentage points. Additionally, we show a significantly large improvement when using an extremely small set of just over 100 images, with over 3× in Average Precision and up to 20 percentage points when estimating the quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.