Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214473›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Robust Deep-Learning Model for Landslide Susceptibility Mapping: A Case Study of Kurdistan Province, Iran.

Bahareh Ghasemian, Himan Shahabi, Ataollah Shirzadi, Nadhir Al-Ansari, Abolfazl Jaafari, Victoria R Kress, Marten Geertsema, Somayeh Renoud, Anuar Ahmad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
14.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

Bahareh GhasemianDepartment of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 6617715175, Iran.
Himan ShahabiDepartment of Geomorphology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 6617715175, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-5091-6947
Ataollah ShirzadiDepartment of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj 6617715175, Iran.ORCID 0000-0001-9668-8687
Nadhir Al-AnsariCivil, Environmental and Natural Resources Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-6790-2653
Abolfazl JaafariResearch Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran 1496813111, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-3441-6560
Victoria R KressDepartment of Ecosystem Science and Management, University of Northern British Columbia, 3333 University Way, Prince George, BC V2N 4Z9, Canada.
Marten GeertsemaResearch Geomorphologist, Ministry of Forests, Lands, Natural Resource Operations and Rural Development, 499 George Street, Prince George, BC V2L 1R5, Canada.
Somayeh RenoudData Mining Laboratory, Department of Engineering, College of Farabi, University of Tehran, Tehran 1417935840, Iran.
Anuar AhmadDepartment of Geoinformation, Faculty of Built Environment and Surveying, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Johor Bahru 81310, Malaysia.
University of Kurdistan · IRAgricultural Research & Education Organization · IRLuleå University of Technology · SEMinistry of Forests · CAUniversity of Northern British Columbia · CAUniversity of Technology Malaysia · MYUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We mapped landslide susceptibility in Kamyaran city of Kurdistan Province, Iran, using a robust deep-learning (DP) model based on a combination of extreme learning machine (ELM), deep belief network (DBN), back propagation (BP), and genetic algorithm (GA). A total of 118 landslide locations were recorded and divided in the training and testing datasets. We selected 25 conditioning factors, and of these, we specified the most important ones by an information gain ratio (IGR) technique. We assessed the performance of the DP model using statistical measures including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1-measure, and area under-the-receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Three benchmark algorithms, i.e., support vector machine (SVM), REPTree, and NBTree, were used to check the applicability of the proposed model. The results by IGR concluded that of the 25 conditioning factors, only 16 factors were important for our modeling procedure, and of these, distance to road, road density, lithology and land use were the four most significant factors. Results based on the testing dataset revealed that the DP model had the highest accuracy (0.926) of the compared algorithms, followed by NBTree (0.917), REPTree (0.903), and SVM (0.894). The landslide susceptibility maps prepared from the DP model with AUC = 0.870 performed the best. We consider the DP model a suitable tool for landslide susceptibility mapping.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLandslidesGeographic Information SystemsIranSupport Vector Machinedeep belief networkextreme learning machinegenetic algorithmGISIranlandslide susceptibility

Identifiers

PMID35214473
PMCPMC8878333
OpenAlexW4212956061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.