Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214382›Full record

SynthesisSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Gait Impairment in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review.

Anthony Dever, Dylan Powell, Lisa Graham, Rachel Mason, Julia Das, Steven J Marshall, Rodrigo Vitorio, Alan Godfrey, Samuel Stuart

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Benzoate Drugs for Traumatic Brain Injury.Journal of clinical & experimental immunology · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Associations Between Prior Head Injury, Physical Functioning, and Frailty in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anthony DeverSport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.
Dylan PowellDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1233-5468
Lisa GrahamSport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.
Rachel MasonSport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5087-1969
Julia DasSport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.
Steven J MarshallDepartment of Tourism, Hospitality, Events and Food, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield S1 1WB, UK.
Rodrigo VitorioSport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-9452
Alan GodfreyDepartment of Computer and Information Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4049-9291
Samuel StuartSport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Department, Northumbria University, Newcastle NE1 8ST, UK.

Funding

Parkinson's Foundation PDF-CRA-2073Parkinson's Foundation PDF-FBS-1898Private Physiotherapy Education Foundation (PPEF) RPJ03732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionGait impairment occurs across the spectrum of traumatic brain injury (TBI); from mild (mTBI) to moderate (modTBI), to severe (sevTBI). Recent evidence suggests that objective gait assessment may be a surrogate marker for neurological impairment such as TBI. However, the most optimal method of objective gait assessment is still not well understood due to previous reliance on subjective assessment approaches. The purpose of this review was to examine objective assessment of gait impairments across the spectrum of TBI.

methodsPubMed, AMED, OVID and CINAHL databases were searched with a search strategy containing key search terms for TBI and gait. Original research articles reporting gait outcomes in adults with TBI (mTBI, modTBI, sevTBI) were included.

results156 citations were identified from the search, of these, 13 studies met the initial criteria and were included into the review. The findings from the reviewed studies suggest that gait is impaired in mTBI, modTBI and sevTBI (in acute and chronic stages), but methodological limitations were evident within all studies. Inertial measurement units were most used to assess gait, with single-task, dual-task and obstacle crossing conditions used. No studies examined gait across the full spectrum of TBI and all studies differed in their gait assessment protocols. Recommendations for future studies are provided.

conclusionGait was found to be impaired in TBI within the reviewed studies regardless of severity level (mTBI, modTBI, sevTBI), but methodological limitations of studies (transparency and reproducibility) limit clinical application. Further research is required to establish a standardised gait assessment procedure to fully determine gait impairment across the spectrum of TBI with comprehensive outcomes and consistent protocols.

Indexed as

Brain ConcussionBrain Injuries, TraumaticAdultGaitHumansReproducibility of Resultsbiomechanicsconcussiongaitinertial-measurement-unitTBIwearables

Identifiers

PMID35214382
PMCPMC8875145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.