ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022
High-Frequency Ultrasound Dataset for Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Assessment.
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-frequency ultrasound in anti-aging skin therapy monitoring.Scientific reports · 2023Trial
- An artificial intelligence-driven image quality assessment system for whole-body [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Trial
- Deep learning classification of reproductive tissue from ultrasound: sex determination in red abalone (Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- The usefulness of automated high frequency ultrasound image analysis in atopic dermatitis staging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A multi-task deep learning approach for real-time view classification and quality assessment of echocardiographic images.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- An effective no-reference image quality index prediction with a hybrid Artificial Intelligence approach for denoised MRI images.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Deep Learning-Based Evaluation of Ultrasound Images for Benign Skin Tumors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Deep learning model for automatic image quality assessment in PET.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Challenging Patterns of Atypical Dermatofibromas and Promising Diagnostic Tools for Differential Diagnosis of Malignant Lesions.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis Methods for High-Frequency Ultrasound Data Analysis: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Analysis of facial ultrasonography images based on deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims at high-frequency ultrasound image quality assessment for computer-aided diagnosis of skin. In recent decades, high-frequency ultrasound imaging opened up new opportunities in dermatology, utilizing the most recent deep learning-based algorithms for automated image analysis. An individual dermatological examination contains either a single image, a couple of pictures, or an image series acquired during the probe movement. The estimated skin parameters might depend on the probe position, orientation, or acquisition setup. Consequently, the more images analyzed, the more precise the obtained measurements. Therefore, for the automated measurements, the best choice is to acquire the image series and then analyze its parameters statistically. However, besides the correctly received images, the resulting series contains plenty of non-informative data: Images with different artifacts, noise, or the images acquired for the time stamp when the ultrasound probe has no contact with the patient skin. All of them influence further analysis, leading to misclassification or incorrect image segmentation. Therefore, an automated image selection step is crucial. To meet this need, we collected and shared 17,425 high-frequency images of the facial skin from 516 measurements of 44 patients. Two experts annotated each image as correct or not. The proposed framework utilizes a deep convolutional neural network followed by a fuzzy reasoning system to assess the acquired data's quality automatically. Different approaches to binary and multi-class image analysis, based on the VGG-16 model, were developed and compared. The best classification results reach 91.7% accuracy for the first, and 82.3% for the second analysis, respectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.