Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35214381›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2022

High-Frequency Ultrasound Dataset for Deep Learning-Based Image Quality Assessment.

Joanna Czajkowska, Jan Juszczyk, Laura Piejko, Małgorzata Glenc-Ambroży

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. An artificial intelligence-driven image quality assessment system for whole-body [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joanna CzajkowskaFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6237-1793
Jan JuszczykFaculty of Biomedical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Roosevelta 40, 41-800 Zabrze, Poland.
Laura PiejkoInstitute of Physiotherapy and Health Sciences, Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education, Mikołowska 72a, 40-065 Katowice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5338-1842
Małgorzata Glenc-AmbrożyAmber Academy, Piownik 3, 44-200 Rybnik, Poland.

Funding

Silesian University of Technology 07/010/BK\_22/1011Silesian University of Technology 07/010/RGH20/1004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims at high-frequency ultrasound image quality assessment for computer-aided diagnosis of skin. In recent decades, high-frequency ultrasound imaging opened up new opportunities in dermatology, utilizing the most recent deep learning-based algorithms for automated image analysis. An individual dermatological examination contains either a single image, a couple of pictures, or an image series acquired during the probe movement. The estimated skin parameters might depend on the probe position, orientation, or acquisition setup. Consequently, the more images analyzed, the more precise the obtained measurements. Therefore, for the automated measurements, the best choice is to acquire the image series and then analyze its parameters statistically. However, besides the correctly received images, the resulting series contains plenty of non-informative data: Images with different artifacts, noise, or the images acquired for the time stamp when the ultrasound probe has no contact with the patient skin. All of them influence further analysis, leading to misclassification or incorrect image segmentation. Therefore, an automated image selection step is crucial. To meet this need, we collected and shared 17,425 high-frequency images of the facial skin from 516 measurements of 44 patients. Two experts annotated each image as correct or not. The proposed framework utilizes a deep convolutional neural network followed by a fuzzy reasoning system to assess the acquired data's quality automatically. Different approaches to binary and multi-class image analysis, based on the VGG-16 model, were developed and compared. The best classification results reach 91.7% accuracy for the first, and 82.3% for the second analysis, respectively.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerUltrasonographydeep learninghigh-frequency ultrasoundimage classificationimage quality assessmenttransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID35214381
PMCPMC8875486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.