ArticlePharmaceutics2022
Mathematical Modeling of Targeted Drug Delivery Using Magnetic Nanoparticles during Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.
Article in Pharmaceutics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Spatiotemporal Image-Guided Model of Radiopharmaceutical Transport in Heterogeneous Vasculature Prostate Tumor: A Computational Analysis of Key Parameters in Lutetium-177 PSMA Therapy.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Magnetically Controlled Nanocarriers for Site-Specific Drug Delivery and Theranostics in Cancer Precision Medicine.Molecular imaging and biology · 2026Review
- Physiological Considerations and Delivery Strategies for Targeting Tumors Through Intraperitoneal Delivery.Pharmaceutical research · 2025Review
- A comprehensive insight of innovations and recent advancements in nanocarriers for nose-to-brain drug targeting.Designed monomers and polymers · 2025Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in the diagnosis, treatment, and recurrence prediction of peritoneal carcinomatosis.Heliyon · 2024Review
- Multi-Scale and Multi-Physics Models of the Transport of Therapeutic/Diagnostic Cancer Agents.Cancers · 2023Article
- An in silico model of the capturing of magnetic nanoparticles in tumour spheroids in the presence of flow.Biomedical microdevices · 2023Article
- Image-Based Modeling of Drug Delivery during Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in a Heterogeneous Tumor Nodule.Cancers · 2023Article
- A Review of Advanced Multifunctional Magnetic Nanostructures for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy Integrated into an Artificial Intelligence Approach.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Synthesizing and Optimizing Rutile TiOInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2022Article
- Application of a multicomponent model of convectional reaction-diffusion to description of glucose gradients in a neurovascular unit.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has emerged as a promising method for the treatment of peritoneal malignancies (PMs). However, microenvironmental barriers in the tumor limit the delivery of drug particles and their deep penetration into the tumor, leading to reduced efficiency of treatment. Therefore, new drug delivery systems should be developed to overcome these microenvironmental barriers. One promising technique is magnetically controlled drug targeting (MCDT) in which an external magnetic field is utilized to concentrate drug-coated magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) to the desired area. In this work, a mathematical model is developed to investigate the efficacy of MCDT in IP chemotherapy. In this model, considering the mechanism of drug binding and internalization into cancer cells, the efficacy of drug delivery using MNPs is evaluated and compared with conventional IP chemotherapy. The results indicate that over 60 min of treatment with MNPs, drug penetration depth increased more than 13 times compared to conventional IPC. Moreover, the drug penetration area (DPA) increased more than 1.4 times compared to the conventional IP injection. The fraction of killed cells in the tumor in magnetic drug delivery was 6.5%, which shows an increase of more than 2.5 times compared to that of the conventional method (2.54%). Furthermore, the effects of magnetic strength, the distance of the magnet to the tumor, and the magnetic nanoparticles' size were evaluated. The results show that MDT can be used as an effective technique to increase the efficiency of IP chemotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.